I mean COME ON--she is able to give that kid a chance he would not ordinarily have---what's so wrong about that???
2006-10-25 09:05:46 · 13 answers · asked by Penguin Gal 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
I don't know but come on people did you see the pics of that little boy he didn't look happy nor healthy. So let her have him, he'll be raised in a warm house, have great medical care and more then likely anything else he could ever want. And yes she may have done some pretty weird such in her career but that's her job to entertain which she has done for many years. Beside how many movie stars/ Singer aren't weird (Tom Cruise, Brittany Spears, etc. Is in the job description) And I think for the mean part she just as good of a mom as most people and if she not I beat the thousands of live in babysitters are wonderful.
I wish both of them the best of luck. Is always a good thing when a child does not have to live in that bad on conditions!!!
2006-10-25 09:28:39 · answer #1 · answered by sweetie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your right there is nothing wrong with it, except no one explained to the father that he was giving him up forever, according to the paper. The father thought that Madonna was taking his son to live with her and get good education, he did not understand what really was going on. So until that gets straightened out she shouldn't take the child. If it is meant to be it will.
2006-10-25 09:16:46 · answer #2 · answered by lennie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The father of the boy now says that he didn't know what he was signing and wasn't aware Madonna was going to keep the child. The father thought the child would be returned to him in a couple of years.
2006-10-25 09:12:05 · answer #3 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because of the way it took place, the father never agreed to let her adopt him forever and she took advantage of that and took the kid. She now has an 18 months with the kid as her own when that 18 months is up it'll be up to the father of the kid to decide what happens next.
2006-10-25 09:12:17 · answer #4 · answered by Grazia 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
just tired of hearing about it...the big stink was that a woman witha ton of money could get special treatment since malawi hasn't let anyone else outside of the country adopt a child from malawi
i have let it go, and got over it. that kid is going to have a good life
2006-10-25 09:08:55 · answer #5 · answered by Jenn 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because she's a mega star by which the media can sell a lot of newspapers, magazines, TV shows, etc by using her image. It's all about the greenbacks baby. C'mon, what country are you living in?
2006-10-25 09:09:08 · answer #6 · answered by Big Blue 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Madonna is on Oprah, right now, talking about the adoption.
2006-10-25 09:14:04 · answer #7 · answered by newyorkgal71 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Oooh, look! Somebody else's personal business!
Plus she's rich, and a lot of people hate her.
That basically sums it.
2006-10-25 09:08:19 · answer #8 · answered by jonjon418 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not so much what she did as how she did it..she basically went to a poor village and bought a child...that isn't right no matter how rich you are...
2006-10-25 10:13:15 · answer #9 · answered by geordie.lady 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
anyone who is rich and famous in this country gets treated poorly and i think it is from others being jealous
2006-10-25 09:20:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋