Are you French? If so, go to New York... the bonanza of food is amazing. And don't miss Grand Central's oyster bar - incredible!
2006-10-25 09:03:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Cru A 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both are interesting. Boston is actually more difficult to get around as the roads can get confusing. New York is easy to navigate. Depending on your budget....I would do both.
2006-10-25 09:01:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by xovenusxo 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
New York !
Been to both, More to see and do in the Capital of the World.
2006-10-25 09:30:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by ccfromnj 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
come to new york, then drive to boston, only 6-7 hours difference. boston was boring to me. born and raised in new york.
2006-10-25 08:59:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I even have lived in the two cites, i'm from Chicago and at the instant stay in Chicago and love Chicago yet NYC rather is in a distinctive league. i think of that Chicago is one among the sole US cities to rival NYC although yet NYC is merely plenty larger and has a greater distinctive inhabitants and better inhabitants density so it quite is surely a real city, Chicago is merely too yet no longer on the size of NYC and that i say that as a diehard Chicago guy.
2016-12-28 04:54:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by boynton 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
New York City definitly!!!
There is no city like it in the country!!! It's sensory overload when there! Too much to see, do, smell, etc...
2006-10-25 09:05:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jackson 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
new york is better /but in your case i think it wont matter much
2006-10-25 09:36:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've been to both - both great - but for me it's NYC...and I've been there many times now - can't get enough of it.
2006-10-25 09:04:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by svmainus 7
·
0⤊
0⤋