2006-10-25 08:35:23 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
no one seems to understand what is happening to the dallas cowboys. the offense they have is amazing, they have 2 pro bowl recievers and a pro bowl tight end...but their offensive line couldn't block their moms. it doesnt matter who the hell is qb if he has no time to throw. look at how many times Michael Vick was sacked last game, and no one will call him unmobile. bledsoe has the stronger and more accurate arm, and the experience. the play calling also has alot to do with his performance, and the teams. if i had TO and terry on my team i'd throw deep deep deep again and again, and get witten more involved in the offense. unfortunately witten has to be kept in to block, so he can't be used as a weapon. so, in short, no, bledsoe should have been kept in.
2006-10-25 09:38:00 · answer #1 · answered by countryisking 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
To be honest... they don't need a new Qb.. bledsoe would be perfectly fitting in a team that had a running game.. all the WR's in the world do no good if they have no blocking.. the running game is essential to the pass... the line can put 3-4 men on it and play a zone defense.. TO is good.. but is he good enough to play double coverage every single game and still produce like he's getting paid.. no.. every top 10 team has a 1000+ rusher at least..
Bledsoe has never been on a team with a good running back.. hes always on these mediocre teams and his name is used to try and make it seem like he can change everything.. he's getting older.. but he can still play well... cowboys need to stop stacking certain areas and worry about balance..
2006-10-25 17:21:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not! Tony Romo is a piece of s**t! He has his head so far up TO's a**. He was desperate to be a starting QB that he screwed Bledsoe over. I hope he gets slaughtered this year and Bledsoe tells the Cowboys organization where to stick it when they come crawling back to him.
2006-10-25 18:25:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
yeah, the INT he threw when they were trying to score is what did it. Parcell's said the play they ran was designed to go to the other side of the field. you could tell before they even ran the play Bledsoe wanted to throw to Terry Glenn. he never even looked to the right. that's just flat out arrogance right there! not even going with your first reads, and not even throwing where the play should've been made. if they would've scored right there, they could've gone into halftime with a 14-12 lead, and that would've been a huge momentum swing for them, as they were getting the ball back first in the second half.
I've only seen one positive with Bledsoe-he can throw the ball 60+ yards in the air, and not many QB's can do that. Only problem with that his he has to have time, and if he doesn't, there's a very high chance he'll be sacked, or he'll throw an INT.
2006-10-25 15:40:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I agree with jd's answer, while Bledsoe was ineffective, Tony Romo was statistically better in almost every category except interceptions.
A moot point to be sure since the Cowboys were never really in the game after the 2nd quarter.
2006-10-25 15:41:56 · answer #5 · answered by Dave C 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Drew Bledsoe deserved to be replaced years ago,
2006-10-25 17:23:28 · answer #6 · answered by stan l 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Dude, did you even watch the game??
He was horrible, horrendous, couldnt so anything right, sucked.
As a Giant fan, it was soooooooooo much fun to watch the Cowgirls implode.
Yeah he deserved to be benched. He did exactly what he did in Philly, which was drove them downfield and threw a pick in the endzone. The guy SUCKS.
What was even more fun was watching the Cowboys struggle with Romo at the helm. The Giants got, what? 3 picks? 4?
It was BEAUTIFUL.
2006-10-25 17:15:40 · answer #7 · answered by JusticeManEsq 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, he didn't. We'll see how good Romo is starting this Sunday night. I say they should have stuck with Bledsoe for at least one more game.
2006-10-25 15:40:03 · answer #8 · answered by hardcoco 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
He should have been replaced at the first of the year. If Romo had more time under center, he could be a good QB. Not a Troy Aikman or a Roger Staubach, but good.
2006-10-25 15:40:44 · answer #9 · answered by Bad Pookie 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
NO!!! He deserves to get an offensive line that protects him!
I thought it was fitting that Romo threw an interception on his first pass....ha..ha..ha..
2006-10-25 16:10:43 · answer #10 · answered by Nunya 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋