English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Yay or Nay? And of course WHY or WHY NOT? :)

2006-10-25 07:35:14 · 9 answers · asked by immygrant 3 in Politics & Government Politics

9 answers

Yes.

Many will try to frame this question as a debate on whether or not to kill babies, but that point of view demands the the U.S. outlaw most artificial insemination, as the "babies" they are discussing are simply fertilized eggs - one single cell - that are sitting in fertility clinics and will be thrown into the trash otherwise.

Additionally, the argument that there aren't yet proven benefits is both misleading and false. It's misleading because the technology is so new (and federal support so limited) that there hasn't been time for many developments. And it's false because they have regrown spinal connection in mice using stem cells. Yes - the paralyzed have been made able to walk.

2006-10-25 07:38:43 · answer #1 · answered by Steve 6 · 1 1

Yay. I think we have to look at the people with Parkison's, Alzeheimer's, or other types of cancer. Most of these embryos come from fertilization clinics where they are the leftovers of embryo implantation. Only 2% of embryos come from abortion clinics. These embryos are only a couple of days old and haven't even begun to form, they are literally cells. These cells could shape into liver, kidney and other cells because embryonic stem cells have this capacity. So some people are going to say that adult spine cells are better or umbilical cords but they aren't that potent and can't be used for a variety of diseases. These embryos are going to be thrown into the garbage either way and why not used them to save a life?

2006-10-25 10:34:20 · answer #2 · answered by cynical 6 · 0 0

Nay. At least, I mean for embryonic stem cell research, which is what I assume you're asking about.

Why? Because one must kill a human (the embryo) to harvest the stem cells. No brainer.

2006-10-25 07:37:04 · answer #3 · answered by Sheik Yerbouti 4 · 1 0

Absolutely, the embryos that scientists want to use are going to be THROWN AWAY. There are thousands and thousands of embryos that are thrown away because some reproductive therapies requires making many embryos from one couples ova and sperm to try to get one to implant correctly.

Don't you think it's better that these embryos be used in an effort to better all of humanity than simply be thrown away. Sure someone could have one of them implanted and it grow up to be a person, but the fact is that there are way too many of them and no where near all of them will ever be implanted and grow up normally. There will always be ample supply of embryos for women that want one implanted and thousands more that will be thrown away.

2006-10-25 07:49:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

EMBRYONIC stem cell research has been a major failure.

ADULT stem cell research has been a big success.

Dems conveniently refuse to make the distinction.

2006-10-25 07:41:35 · answer #5 · answered by C = JD 5 · 1 0

Abortion could be felony despite the fact that it extremely is incorrect and evil and outright homicide to an harmless unborn baby. think of approximately it that baby will not at all see sunlight hours or laugh or journey a bike or savor having pals or be attentive to the affection of a be certain. This unborn baby will not at all be attentive to the failings that we take with none attention in our extensive-unfold lifes. Plus that baby is torn to products for the period of the abortion it extremely is between the strategies that's killed ripped limb from limb. So hence i think of stem cellular examine is faulty additionally. regardless of each and every thing you have already brought about the unborn toddler lots misery and soreness and introduced it extremely is life from it so a minimum of leave their undesirable bodies on my own. Abortion and Stem cellular examine are merely yet another certainly one of mankind's vile and vicious and evil issues. I pray that God might have mercy on all of people who get abortions and function had abortions. i'm happy that those undesirable infants will stay with him and heaven continuously. i will no longer make it there myself who's attentive to yet a minimum of they might. merely so which you be attentive to no baby is an accident all of them come here with a objective yet some not at all have the possibility to fulfill there objective using cruelty of mankind. sooner or later it extremely is going to come to pass that we are going to might desire to account for the failings we've executed and provided that we are extremely sorry and regretful for those issues can we be forgiven. i be attentive to that there are some who will see this in a distinctive way than me alongside with atheist and persons of non-christian or perhaps some christian religions yet it extremely is effective interior the top of time it may come to pass that what i think is faulty yet i do no longer care using fact i'm happy for now. properly there you have my opinion.

2016-11-25 20:18:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yay. It's just common sense.

The embryos that are used to harvest stem cells are just going to be destroyed anyway.

2006-10-25 07:39:35 · answer #7 · answered by Wayne Z 7 · 1 1

there have been no positive results from embtyo stem cell research as advocated by democr

2006-10-25 07:38:43 · answer #8 · answered by Shiraz!! 1 · 1 1

Yes. It's really no diffferent than organ donation.

2006-10-25 07:39:51 · answer #9 · answered by notme 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers