She was interviewed in TV this morning, saying the press just said bad things about her (which they did).
2006-10-25 06:05:20 · 15 answers · asked by Lovely &..... 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
I'm not sure.
2006-10-25 06:07:12 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's a bit of both - in terms of what this child will benefit it's a great amount - the chance to live in a wealthy world, never be hungry, have great clothes, a private education etc, however, giving one child a rags to riches once in a lifetime chanc will not solve the problems facing Africa as a continent, what about the other millions of children condemned to live in poverty and die young :
As the saying goes, give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day, give an man the tools to fish with and he'll feed his family for ever.
Also, although this child will never want materially again, Madonna's children are frequently left with nannies, and move in and out of schools around the world to suit Madonna's wants and needs, he'll never have a normal childhood with her as his mother.
And IF this was a publicity stunt, to show the world what a good person she is, it certainly worked, but it certainly backfired on her big time.
2006-10-25 06:13:30 · answer #2 · answered by Bumblebee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not something is incorrect with it, yet i do locate it kinda strange that straight away she is going to Africa and receives a toddler out of no the position. I recommend even as Angelina Jolie did it she became doing charity artwork and then befell to fall in love with a baby, in spite of the indisputable fact that the way Madonna did it type of feels kinda faux, Africa isnt the in basic terms u . s . a . with negative toddlers.
2016-12-05 05:28:53 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he may be doing it for genuine reasons but it seems like the fasionalbe FAMOUS thing to do lately!
I wonder also whether this publicity is all about an upcoming new single or album.....only time will tell I guess!
2006-10-25 06:08:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is Madonna we're talking about here. Who knows WHAT'S going on inside that brain of hers?
2006-10-25 06:37:48 · answer #5 · answered by blooutflash 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would think not, but Madonna is just another celeb who gets wierder the longer and more famous she is, kinda like Michael Jackson. I used like to like both of them but now they are just too wierd and the less I see of em the better.!!!!!!!!!!
2006-10-25 06:10:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe she did it because she really wanted to give a needy child a home....but she could have adopted from the US and I kinda wish she had.
2006-10-25 06:46:53 · answer #7 · answered by TequilaTax 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She only adopted the boy for PR reasons.
2006-10-25 06:08:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yup. She genuinely want to keep the attention on herself. Angelina is getting waaaay too much attention and she is getting squat. She loves to shock and she's full of crap.
2006-10-25 06:07:46 · answer #9 · answered by morrowynd 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
first, there's no "e" in "truly." second, "truly genuine" is repetitive. "fakely genuine" is an oxymoron.
anyway, what would be her fake reason for adopting? she doesn't stand to gain anything, right? she doesn't need to impress anyone.
2006-10-25 06:17:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have my doubts, but I hope not, it is evil to exploit a child for the sake of publicity.
2006-10-25 06:07:14 · answer #11 · answered by sparkleythings_4you 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋