English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

Napoleon is trying to fit in. He tries to act as though he is cooler than he is. Pedro wears a wig after he shaves his head so he fits in. The whole piece at the election show when the geeky kids feel comfortable coming forward because they are all together and are the majority. Kip adapting a gangsta persona to be cool.

2006-10-25 06:53:53 · answer #1 · answered by jsauls3271 6 · 0 0

If the data became so sparkling decrease approximately WMD's and Iraq, why did Dick Cheney individually deliver jointly his very own team to return up with data linking Iraq to WMD's while the CIA first informed him that there became no connection? Why did he flow right down to the CIA numerous circumstances and purposefully attempt to get the documents linking the two? Why did he forget approximately approximately warning from the worldwide community and the CIA with reference to the unreliability of a few of expertise factors he became using (jointly with CurveBall as one occasion)? Why did he and his assistant Scooter Libby smash the occupation and out a CIA agent while he informed a various tale than the stable line approximately WMD's? How did statements approximately yellow cake get into Bush's speech after it the President became informed time returned that the documents became fake and the information became explicitly vetted out of the speech? Why did the President and his team immediately try responsible Saddam and 9/11? Why did Cheney constantly lie approximately any such hyperlink on television after he became repeatedly informed that there became no hyperlink? Why became the NIA assessment basically made in weeks while it could have taken months or years to deliver jointly? How do you clarify the Downing highway memos? i think of it is you who're being obscure and naive on your protection right here. Iraq did have WMD's which we gave them for the Iran-Iraq conflict. the only data that they WMD's on the term while Bush invaded became so shaky it could have on no account been used as justification for any variety of distant places coverage. i think of you may study the data your self. start up by looking at a frontline documentary referred to as "Bush's conflict', additionally 'No bring about Sight' covers the small print of the fallacy of Bush's conflict coverage as nicely. it is barely one branch of 1 of the various stuff that Bush has botched by the years as President. i might enhance greater examples, yet i'm particular you have you're very own handy denials of all of it and that i could no longer even start to get into the small print of why your denials are bogus in this one question.

2016-10-16 09:47:37 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

-Kip going 'gansta'
-Pedro running for prez...using things such as his "cousins with seet hook-ups" and a pinata to get votes.
-Napoleon telling crazy stories or bragging to fit in
-Pedro 'building' his cake to get a date (the circle yes or no note involved)
-Napoleon drawing the picture for the girl

2006-10-28 18:34:12 · answer #3 · answered by Courtlyn 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers