2006-10-25 04:06:39 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Hmmm that is a pretty harsh comparison. But I guess if you cut and fry the potato, salt it, and put it with a big mac, how can it lose?
2006-10-25 04:16:27 · answer #1 · answered by E 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
The potato would stay quiet and not make himself look foolish. Bush would open his mouth and make himself look like a moron 5 seconds within the debate. Potato wins.
2006-10-25 11:14:47 · answer #2 · answered by Bool 2 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Tell me, what has Bush done to warrant such a grotesque comparison? Did he strip an ethnic group within his own country of their citizenship? Did he sanction a night of violence to destroy any ethnic group, its businesses, and its houses of worship? Did he order mass deportations? Did he build concentration camps, where members of any ethnic group were sent? Did he build ovens so he could kill an ethnic group more efficiently? If so, show me some of the six million corpses.
By calling Bush "Hitler," you are saying that Bush is no better than Hitler, and therefore Hitler was no worse than Bush. Such an accusation is one or two steps short of Holocaust denial.
2006-10-25 11:43:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Depends, is it Mr. Potato Head? He's got Bush licked.
2006-10-25 11:08:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Winner, Bush. Second, Potato. Distant third, ye of little brains.
2006-10-25 11:09:59 · answer #5 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
im sure george Hitler bush would win because potatoes cant talk
2006-10-25 11:08:50 · answer #6 · answered by brian 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Mr. Tater Head
2006-10-25 11:09:10 · answer #7 · answered by noonee333 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
a potato is more articulated than Bush for sure
2006-10-25 11:10:05 · answer #8 · answered by me 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
a potato would run circles around w
2006-10-25 11:15:53 · answer #9 · answered by elvis2 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The potato would win... no contest.
2006-10-25 11:14:01 · answer #10 · answered by OccamsTheory 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋