English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why do Dems and libtards assume that those of us who support Bush don't pay attention to current events. Espeically considering we pay more attantion to them than the libtards. Dems say Reps don't think for themselves, and yet they are the ones who believe the one sided liberal media's dribble, and don't research things for themselves. I find it very sad to know that the majority of this country is ignorant enough to think that what they hear on the news is the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So any Dem out there actually want to tell me what should be done to fix things, other than the usually retarded answer of, "Get rid of Bush." Give me your plan of action, and not your retarded insults.

2006-10-25 03:49:11 · 11 answers · asked by bjnljholloway 2 in Politics & Government Elections

Figures that I get 2 thumbs down but no answers yet. Cause dems have no answers. They're just mad that someone has figured out their plan.

2006-10-25 03:53:30 · update #1

Way to go dems. Keep showing your ignorance. I knew no one could say anything other rthan "get rid of Bush"

2006-10-25 03:56:21 · update #2

I am not asking people to not insult me. I know better, because I know that's all dems know. I meant to say, try giving us your plans and not just your insults. all dems have are insults, no plan of action though.

2006-10-25 03:57:48 · update #3

Still waiting for an actual answer from a dem that has a brain. I guess there is no such thing.

2006-10-25 04:05:37 · update #4

My reserach does not come from anyone in the media. It comes from people on the ground. The people who are actually doing things, both in Iraq, and on Capital Hill. I don't rely on the news at all, because in my line of work, I have learned they only report what they think will get the ratings, and they will distort any story to make it more exciting.

2006-10-25 04:08:07 · update #5

I should have known better than to think I would get a actualy legitimate answer from a dem.

2006-10-25 04:30:49 · update #6

11 answers

GOP O8,

THE DEM'S (DUMS) CAN'T EVEN LAY OUT A COURSE OF ACTION BECAUSE THE TRUTH IS THAT THEY ALL WONT TO BEND OVER AND LET THE UN STICK IT UP THERE ***. SO THAT NORTH KOREA AND IRAN CAN GIVE THEM MONEY AND WE CAN SELL THEM WEAPON'S SO THE NEXT TIME THE GOP IS IN POWER THAT CAN ATTACK US SO THE DEM'S CAN BLAME IT ON THE GOP.

2006-10-25 03:59:34 · answer #1 · answered by thundrmark 4 · 3 4

Riddle me this repub-boy – No Middle East expert gave Bush’s plan to invade Iraq more than a 50 percent chance of any success (on any level at all). If you understand this so well, then please provide just one piece of evidence that suggests invading Iraq and removing Saddam was not just a stupid idea doomed to failure.

Colin Powell knew it (that was the point of his pottery barn analogy [“if you break it, you own it”] to the President. In his book – ‘A World Transformed’ (1998) Bush’s own father said that overthrowing Hussein would lead to America being stuck in a quagmire in Iraq that would further destabilize the region and strip the US of its credibility with the other countries of the world (exactly as has happened).

What is the Republican plan, other than ‘well we’re here’? Are you aware that the Kurds will be killed when the Shi’a and Sunni reclaim the northern oil fields? Are you aware that there will never be anything like even a quasi-Kurdish state because neither Turkey nor Syria will allow it? Can you tell us all how you stop 25,000,000 people from having a civil war if they really want to – other than holding the down with brute force as Saddam did?

Are you aware that immediately after 9/11 both Iran and Syria provided valuable intelligence information pinning the attacks on OBL and tracking him to Afghanistan? Without any friends, how are to supposed to obtain the quality intelligence information necessary to prevent further attacks?

Do you even know the difference between Shi’a and Sunni, and how they differ from the Kurds? I did not think so, because the truth is that you are the one who does not understand the situation, has not researched the problem, and is only repeating the same inaccurate and foolish talking points generated by the White House and school flunk/drop-outs Rush and Sean.

2006-10-25 04:23:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

First of all, just because you listen to hypocrite Rush and read slanted internet news editorials doesn't mean you have researched anything. Find an unbiased source like BBC or some other reputable agency for your information.

Second of all, there are several things Dems would do better to serve this country. Balance the federal budget; fully fund medicare, no child left behind, and social security; fund stem cell research; allow medicare to barter with pharmaceutical companies for bulk discounts; immigration reform; and prevent permanent occupation of Iraq. They would also bring back our moral standing in the world by utilizing diplomacy as a first effort in foreign policy, rather than the Bush tactic of shoot first, ask questions later.

2006-10-25 04:04:56 · answer #3 · answered by jimvalentinojr 6 · 1 3

I am affiliated with neither of the corrupted and retarded political cartels. I am a freethinking American, and as such, I offer this view: Democraps and Repukelicans (yes, my lines and I will copyright them in due time) work together with the USG to monopolize and exploit this Americanized version of democracy. The real powers that be fund both, so whomever wins will owe them a favor...fact: had Kerry or Gore won, the same CFR global domination morons would hold key positions. Do yourself a favor, and research the former political lives of George H.W. Bush (as President) and Bill Clinton as Governor of Arkansas (Mena). You'll find that their seemingly "new" friendship was YEARS in the making....but I digress.

"What should be done to fix things", you ask. Firstly, elect true representatives. We are putting the rich, elite into Representative positions, when the majority of Americans are neither rich nor elite!!! Better yet, how about a REAL American running for President. Not an Ivy Leaguer, rich white moron or some corrupted former working class/poor person who claims to be "of the people", but a true American. One whose kids are in public school, and who worked 2 jobs to send them to college. One who cuts his own lawn, works on his own car, AND can do the crossword puzzle. That, in and of itself, will be a begining to "fix things." Since it won't happen, then we must focus support on the minute amount of people in Government, who have yet to be corrupted. I can only think of McCain....perhaps a few junior reps. McCain's ideas on Iraq are perfect, his strategy for the pseudo-war on terror is A-plus and his record against corruption outshines most in Congress. Nevermind, forget all I've said and go back to your partisan way of thinking.

2006-10-25 04:06:03 · answer #4 · answered by irish_american_psycho 3 · 1 3

You know what? You're just going on and on and on and on like the f*cking Duracell Rabbit! You're talking out the side of your face! Who are you to knock Dems or Libs? You can't be serious about calling someone retarded when president Bush can't even complete an entire sentence without bumbling something from out of no where! Oh yeah we're in such good shape with GWB as our president! I won't even give his A*s a capital P for the word president. But I hope you've notice that I gave him a capital A for A*s! And for making your ignorant comments about Dems and Libs------all of you tired a*s repubs can all go do ducks!

2006-10-25 03:58:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

First of all, how about not insulting your opponents but treat us with the respect we deserve? Your concept of us seems to be totally out of step with reality, the popular Straw Man image of the RIGHT WING media and of GOP strategists. It may please you to think in that way. But it's not us.

Now, what to do. First of all, getting rid of Bush is a valid suggestion when his every policy has been a disaster. After that, how about balancing the budget by cutting some spending and rescinding the tax giveaways to the ultra rich? Or do you like paying $250 billion a year in interest in a National Debt that's not only not going away, but getting bigger?

2006-10-25 03:53:57 · answer #6 · answered by kreevich 5 · 5 3

I think there are people on both sides that don't think for themselves. If on election day, you go into the voting booth and just vote your party, you are not thinking for yourself. I go into the voting booth and know exactly what kind of person I am voting for and I don't really care for their party affiliation.

2006-10-25 03:53:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

Do you expect anyone to take such a rude, ignorant and insulting question seriously?

2006-10-25 04:01:48 · answer #8 · answered by Lee 7 · 1 3

He's on TV right now, why don't YOU give him a listen?

BTW: Your closing statement was to "not insult you", but YOU insulted Democrats at least SIX times in your rambling question. What's up with that?

PEACE.

2006-10-25 03:55:58 · answer #9 · answered by -Tequila17 6 · 4 4

It is a waste of time to argue with someone so ignorant that he calls liberals "libtards." Your itsy bitsy mind is already closed.

2006-10-25 03:53:16 · answer #10 · answered by notyou311 7 · 5 4

fedest.com, questions and answers