English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

They're going to pay for it with the $20 million they set aside for the "Victory in Baghdad" party.

2006-10-25 02:09:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

No. That would have to be voted on, and given Mt. Rushmore's status as protected I'd doubt anyone can do anything to it anymore whether that be adding or subtracting faces.

2006-10-25 09:06:22 · answer #2 · answered by Rakahoth 2 · 0 0

I thinks it's only fitting that we put Bushes' face on Mt. Rushmore, in fact I think we should put his entire head on it. After someone removes it from his neck that is.

2006-10-25 09:14:39 · answer #3 · answered by Denny M 3 · 0 0

Maybe the dime. There's not enough space for the ears on Rushmore.

2006-10-25 09:07:00 · answer #4 · answered by Muscat 4 · 0 0

Anyone who has ever been to Rushmore, knows there is no more room for another face.

2006-10-25 09:09:58 · answer #5 · answered by snobunny 3 · 0 0

I hear they are going to erect a bronze statue in DC. 50 foot statue of Bush standing next to a body bag, his finger pointing toward Arlington Cemetary. A banner behind him will read "stay the course"

2006-10-25 09:23:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Probably no truth. However if they did it would be an insult to Washington, Lincoln, Roosevelt and Jefferson. I would rather they blow up the mountain first.

2006-10-25 09:17:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

That's not something that I have heard. There would be huge protests if they tried to do that. There's not really much room left up there, is there?

2006-10-25 09:03:07 · answer #8 · answered by They call me ... Trixie. 7 · 0 0

I think they should make Bush toilets, then everyone can crap in his mouth.

2006-10-25 09:05:37 · answer #9 · answered by Too Young To Know 1 · 0 0

O goody . Where do I send my donation?

2006-10-25 09:04:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers