Marvin Harrison, Willie Parker, and Deuce McAllister. Good trade???
2006-10-25 01:59:49 · 8 answers · asked by Tom C 1 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
My other RBs are LT and Tatum Bell. My other WRs are TO, Bernard Berrian, and Donte Stallworth.
2006-10-25 02:06:00 · update #1
I would say no. Although Browns having a monster year, Harrison will keep putting up numbers, (as we saw with his 2 touchdown day last week.) Parker's having a great year, and they can't take the ball away from Deuce with the way hes running. McGahee's still not living up to his hype, and I don't feel too comfortable about Jackson, so keep your 3 guys.
2006-10-25 02:04:55 · answer #1 · answered by Patrick R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is an unfair deal. McAllister is still racking up the TDs until Reggie can prove to pound it in the end zone. Parker has been superb for the Steelers and will most likely get more opportunities with Big Ben in pain. And Harrison? Him and Peyton are inseparatable. Yes, you would be getting a quality back in Jackson with an ok-to-good backs in McGahee and Brown, but the trade is unfair on your end. Stick with the 3 you already have
2006-10-25 03:32:25 · answer #2 · answered by Frank 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's an ok trade. You're giving up your best WR for two decent RBs. You already have a boatload of RBs, so I don't know why you'd want to do that.
All this depends on how many RBs and WRs start.
2006-10-26 00:20:33 · answer #3 · answered by HL 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way Harrison and the colts are the best passing
2006-10-25 02:54:32 · answer #4 · answered by jercha 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no you would be giving up the 2nd best reciever and 7th best running back for not much harrison isnt producing this year manning is looking to wayne alot
2006-10-25 02:20:36 · answer #5 · answered by Brad C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say decline
2006-10-25 03:17:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the answer is no
2006-10-25 03:32:04 · answer #7 · answered by Ryanisthecoolestkidintheuniverse 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO WAY
2006-10-25 04:23:27 · answer #8 · answered by football23 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋