Do you think it is morally right to marry someone then divorce them and ask for that absurd amount of money when Paul McCartney worked hard for his money. It is his money not hers!
2006-10-25 01:05:29 · 27 answers · asked by Miss K 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
she is a one legged whore who wants a bit of extra money, if i saw her in the street id take her leg off and hit her with it!!!!!!!
2006-10-25 10:40:07 · answer #1 · answered by Hannah 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She's a cow. Nothing she's done during her marriage to Sir Paul McCartney warrants the amount of money she is asking for. And her behaviour now is just the lowest of the low. She'd better watch her back, because her ex-husband is a lot more popular and powerful than she could ever be. I can't see her being able to redeem herself in the eyes of the public, stupid woman. She has absolutely no dignity, and I hope Sir Paul gets custody of their daughter too. She's not fit to be a mother if you ask me. Even her own father says she's a liar. she should just accept £50 million (more than enough) and crawl back under her stone. Good to see Kate Moss slagging her off in today's Sun too-she's gonna be a total billy no-mates from now on!
2006-10-25 02:42:51 · answer #2 · answered by Twisty 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've never understood why women get so much money from men when they divorce - they get the house, the kids and worst of all the dog. It seems it is assumed the man is in the wrong and must pay. Well, it takes two to make a complicated dance I can tell you from personal experience. I think she's shot herself in the foot, everyone's going to hate her - Paul McCartney is a British institution and she, with her huge claim for damages and accusations is implying he has been absolutely awful before anyone has the chance to hear any evidence. I never liked her, never.
2006-10-25 01:09:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
This is very true, but he refused her offer of a pre-nuptial agreement before they got married, so it's his own fault really. There is also a child to think about, and the child[I don't know his/her sex or name] must be looked after. It's a bad situation and although I don't really care too much for Sir Paul I do feel for him . I read that even Yoko has asked the media to give him some space and leave him alone.
2006-10-25 01:14:58 · answer #4 · answered by Tws 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Heather Mills is a lightweight when it comes to marrying a Beatle for his money. She ought to contact Yoko Ono Lennon for advice on how to really rake poor Paul over the coals. Yoko breaks up John's marriage by rolling around with him in John and Cynthia's bed, Cynthia comes home and finds Yoko sitting there in her housecoat. After she becomes Mrs. Lennon number 2, Yoko gets John to blow off his son Julian like the kid never existed, and turns John into her housekeeper. Now she's suing for royalties to John's music - again. What Lennon song did Yoko ever write and her singing sounds like the noises I made when I was in labor with my two kids. Heather needs Yoko and not a bunch of lawyers if she wants to learn how to profit off marrying a rich man.
2006-10-25 03:11:52 · answer #5 · answered by Debra D 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is blatantly obvious what her plan was from the very start. Paul was a fool to ignore what others were telling him but the bigger fool will be any judge who listens to her an awards her any of HIS fortune. He should get custody of the child as he's the one that's financially independent and she should pack her bags and leave. The more she opens her mouth, the more I think the general public despise her. She's sepid, pure evil. Go away woman!
2006-10-25 03:53:17 · answer #6 · answered by Del5000 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As far as I'm aware; the only figures that have been discussed have all been made up by the Media. So WE don't actually know what she's asked for. Could only be a few quid for all we know.
Don;t buy into all the media hype that's going on with this.
2006-10-25 01:08:44 · answer #7 · answered by Felidae 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Agreed, she should make her own money but lets hope for the sake of their daughter she gets a fair deal out of it all. Not sure what I make of all these allegations that he told her she couldn't breastfeed and that she had to crawl to the toilet because he wouldn't let her keep her antique bedpan. He doesn't strike me as the type, after all Linda was happily married to him for God knows how many years.
2006-10-25 09:33:26 · answer #8 · answered by Cabbage Patch Girl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
According to a recent newspaper story she thinks she is a journalist who bears the same name and who is more articulate and very peeved that her life has been imitated by this woman. Any "lady" who passes herself off as somebody else must, by definition, have very low self esteem. You should feel sorry for the poor deluded creature.
2006-10-25 02:36:42 · answer #9 · answered by Joanne E 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She needs her *** whooped! There is no *** that good to give all that money that Paul worked so hard for to someone who did not help him build his fortune! Paul should have not been that whipped to not ask for a prenup!
2006-10-25 01:30:39 · answer #10 · answered by sam 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lol if you believe the tabloid newspapers you would think she was more than entitled to it(after the abuse and beatings she has received). i do believe it as i do not like mcartney and for no other reason i would like to see him lose a few million as he's a renowned tight ****(he wont miss it), and it would be interesting to see how many anthems to peace he writes after this. also if you look at him from a certain angle you will notice eyes are slightly close together
2006-10-25 01:15:33 · answer #11 · answered by Troubled Joe(the ghost of) 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋