English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is he trying to deceive us? Is that part of how perfect He is? He's a tricky lil' guy.

2006-10-24 23:23:44 · 19 answers · asked by The Instigator 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

19 answers

And how did he get down the chimney without tracking soot everywhere. Oh, I got God confused with Santa Claus because they are both pretend.

2006-10-25 04:09:15 · answer #1 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 1 0

It is amazing that somebody could be unable to understand that the eruption of Mount St Helens blew a whole mountain apart in a gas explosion and that the mountain is the rocks that got their dates measured. The pumice and ash are not rock yet and are only now turning into fertile soils.
Or that just don't understand the difference between fact and theory.
Or don't recognize the fact that if you know what you are looking at those deformed skeletons can teach you a lot. Is the evidence and are the theories perfect, no of course not. only fictions are ever perfect. and then only if they have a very good author.

2006-10-24 23:38:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

God "left the evidence" because that is how life on earth developed. You can even watch natural selection in action, on petri dishes in a lab or in the wild, in changing ecosystems where as the landscape changes one variant of a species may become more successful than others (there's a famous study of moths in England that showed that a darker color phase of a certain moth species became better able to survive predators as industrial pollution made the local tree bark sooty and dark, helping that moth blend in while its previously more populous white cousins became more visible to predators).

Mainstream, mainline Christians believe, to put it simply, that God created evolution...that that is the means by which the world as we know it came to be. The creation narratives in the Book of Genesis are faith stories -- statements of theology, of who created the world and why, and why it's in the state it's in now -- and not treatises on geology or palenotology or prehistoric anthropology. This isn't even an issue in mainstream Christianity.

2006-10-25 00:05:31 · answer #3 · answered by tawonda2 2 · 1 0

The truth of the matter is - we see what we want to believe. An evolutionist scientist picking up a stone will talk about the evidence of evolution while a creationist scientist will talk about the evidence of creation.

What you see as evidence for evolution, I definitely see none (I am a doctor and fully trained in all the major disciplines of science). God, being God would not deceive us. Why should he? But man, being man, being sinful, and not able to think properly, will often come up with the wrong conclusions and is easily deceived.

2006-10-24 23:31:48 · answer #4 · answered by curious 2 · 2 2

it is not god,look Since it was formulated by Darwin in 1859, the theory of evolution has drawn the attention of scientists and the general public. Evolutionists, who took evolution for a scientific doctrine, have striven hard through research but have failed to support any of the assumptions on which it was based. It is not only the “ape-man” link that is missing, but indeed no other intermediate species in the long (imaginary) chain of evolution, starting from the simplest protozoa, could be identified.

If evolution was ever possible, we should have now on earth billions of intermediary species, both in types and numbers. Also if such mutations ever occurred in ancient times, paleontologists should have found among the fossils countless traces of intermediary species. Paleontologists failed to find any. On the contrary, the oldest fossils of the Cambrian age earth strata proved that a wide variety of living organisms, that represent almost all basic animal divisions (phyla), appeared simultaneously, with no primitive predecessor.

For more on this:
The Collapse of the Theory of Evolution in 20 Questions

Natural selection, one of the pillars of the evolution myth, cannot produce a higher-order species from a simpler one. If a species fails to adapt to its surrounding environment, this would either lead to extinction or to modification of its behavior and function, but could never change its identity to another.
true scientific research and thought have disproved every bit of the evolution doctrines. Nowadays, the significant number of scientists are creationists, in the sense that they realize and admit that the existence and functioning of the living biota could only be through an external Super Force. This Force works through its intelligence (wisdom), information (knowledge), will, and power.
human knowledge is limited to observing the structure and composition of living matter, but not how it was or can be created. Similarly, human intelligence can understand and correlate the properties and functions of the various life systems or components, but it can never explain why these systems and organs work in such way, nor can it enforce them to work differently or change their governing laws. Neither we nor any other lower-order living species has the power to implant the will in matter for it to become a single living cell, much less for it to evolve into a more complex creature:

2006-10-25 00:40:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Because when he caused the universe to explode into existence out of a scalar field 13.8 billion years ago, that's how he figured life would be brought about. Hence the evidence...

2006-10-24 23:43:56 · answer #6 · answered by evolver 6 · 1 0

Life is a test. GOD test mankind by any means. No body has proved evolution. With the mirobiology and DNA, scientist discovered it is imposiible for evolution and is false man theory.

2006-10-24 23:32:44 · answer #7 · answered by A2Z 4 · 1 1

Oh, no you misunderstand! It's the devil, he's trying to trick us into believing science! lol

Aww.. Aaron and kentgru don't know what theory means in regard to science ;_; :-

"In scientific usage, a theory does not mean an unsubstantiated guess or hunch, as it often does in other contexts. A theory is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a related set of natural or social phenomena. It originates from and/or is supported by experimental evidence."

Clear enough for you boys?

2006-10-24 23:26:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

It is man that is deceiving man with the Theory of Evolution (key word: Theory). You may see "evidence" everywhere, but when I look at the same "evidence" it looks like a hoax.

2006-10-24 23:27:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

what's wrong with you people? why can't we accept the fact that evolution happened? Adam came down to earth hundreds of thousands years ago, but God cursed his descendants into apes for not beleiving in Him (it's mentioned in the Quran: "Be ye apes, despised and rejected...")...that means somewhere in time man turned into ape and then turned back into man through evolution...

2006-10-24 23:45:13 · answer #10 · answered by 【ツ】ρεαcε! 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers