I doubt.
2006-10-24 22:56:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sanju_the_gr8 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
From the US Naval Observatory:
According to the Gregorian calendar, which is the civil calendar in use today, years evenly divisible by 4 are leap years, with the exception of centurial years that are not evenly divisible by 400. Therefore, the years 1700, 1800, 1900 and 2100 are not leap years, but 1600, 2000, and 2400 are leap years.
2006-10-26 01:58:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by homeschoolmom 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think so. But it *is* possible for a year to be a leap year when it is not divisible by 4.
Years that are divisible by four, and years that are divisible by 400 are all leap years.
Oops. Ignore this. The posters after this got it right.
2006-10-24 22:57:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by langdonrjones 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's not a leap year if it's also divisible by 100. But there's another exception to that (don't remember exactly what it is) so that 2000 was a leap year.
2006-10-25 06:36:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by sdc_99 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Even though divisible by 4 the years 1700, 1800 and 2100 are not leap year because of indivisible by 400.
2006-10-24 23:16:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by hm_pearl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes,all the years ending with "00' are not necessarily leap yearsthough they are divisible by 4.For those years ending with two zeroes to be a leap year ,they should be exactly divisible by 400.Hence 400,800,1200,1600.2000 were leap years but 100,200,300,500,600,700,900.1000 etc. etc. were not leap years
2006-10-26 03:54:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by alpha 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes it is possible..if a year is divisible by 4 it is a leap year..another extra condition is for years ending with 00, those years must also be divisible by 400..then only they are considered as leap year.
for ex..1600,2000 are leap years..
1700,1800,2100 are not leap years.
2006-10-24 22:58:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Shiny 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes. For instance when a year has 365 days we can divide that by 4 and get 91.25.
2006-10-24 22:56:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by RIDLEY 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think this rule only applies to the last two digits of the year.
2006-10-24 23:03:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it depends on whether you want a whole number. if so, no. but if you consider decimals, yes. oh, never mind, i misinterpreted the question
2006-10-25 00:33:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋