Using this rationale, shouldn't the "Axis of Evil" be sending missiles over right away?
2006-10-24 22:35:00 · 8 answers · asked by 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Do you really believe that Stephen? That it's fine to attack those whom you "suspect" wish you ill?
2006-10-24 22:46:47 · update #1
Who Abimelech? Weapons of Mass Destruction? That's proved to have been a fallacy. Most of the attackers were Saudi, but for some reason S Arabia was ignored. Selective bias against certain countries maybe?
2006-10-24 23:05:41 · update #2
It never does become right.
2006-10-24 22:42:58 · answer #1 · answered by Beckee 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This is very disturbing, and it simply proves the point that there are "Muslims" that are truly evil. [Whether these are true Muslims is another matter, and, as the movie itself points out, it is for Muslims to do something about it.] Fitna is still available on the web, just do a search. I just watched the film, and it wasn't what I expected. It was all documentary, showing extreme Islamists [and even one of their little children] speaking out for the murder of nonbelievers. There is nothing offensive as in van Gough's "Submission" in which verses of the Koran are printed on the body of a nude woman, which could be offensive even to people who agree with the message. I understand that these views are not mainstream Islam, and I can guarantee that mainstream Muslims are not the ones issuing the death threats. I assume the average Muslim would be upset with "Fitna," for showing Islam in a bad light. But in fact it is the terrorists and their mentors who are at fault, and Geert is right to make it an issue. I hope that this incident will wake people up to the nature of the enemy.
2016-03-18 23:50:00 · answer #2 · answered by Frank 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When you know by the time they attack it will be too late to do any thing. Eg... if no arms embargo is placed on north korea to prevent them preparing their nuclear arsenal for war, nothing will stop them once they decide to launch. The reason for invading these middle eastern countries is to stop them in the preparation stages for attacks before they have a chance to "send missiles over right now"
2006-10-24 22:45:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
In view of the events of 9/11/2001, I would say that we have already been attacked. We have documented evidence of people in middle eastern countries who have declared war on us. They have sophisticated weapons of mass destruction.
There are many attempts that have been foiled because we took the initiative and defended ourselves. So we should just sit back and let those people do whatever they want, to us?
2006-10-24 23:01:44 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Two words''become right''....can not be added into this....
Far to complicated a debate......in fact you say ''be sending missiles over right away''.....
This whole statement you have put to the many...has been made far too simple, and off-putting to be answered in a correct manner.
It just is not like that?.....I'm sorry....to get very good imput, one must write the question...for others to contemplate....
2006-10-24 22:41:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think we should forget about this "axis of evil". It was Untrue propaganda.
2006-10-24 22:40:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
when it is keeping the loonies out of our country and keeping them in theres
2006-10-24 22:38:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
when our president deos it....George W. bush rules!!
2006-10-24 23:08:51 · answer #8 · answered by Beavis 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋