English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

is it better to be a slacker or a good for nothing?

2006-10-24 18:24:25 · 4 answers · asked by GodlySempai 1 in Education & Reference Other - Education

4 answers

slacker they have potential good for nothing has nothing

2006-10-24 18:27:28 · answer #1 · answered by Ynot me 2 4 · 3 0

Better yet a good for nothing slacker

2006-10-24 18:26:43 · answer #2 · answered by Suvivoru2 2 · 1 0

I believe I would rather be called a slacker, which just implies that a person isn't a diligent worker.

Calling someone a good-for-nothing implies that they have a fault in character.

2006-10-24 18:37:38 · answer #3 · answered by Serendipity 7 · 3 0

I like slacker. It's more stylish.

2006-10-24 18:38:32 · answer #4 · answered by p2of9 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers