I just want to get this straight.......I should disregard every credible mainstream scientist on earth, hundreds of years of research about our natural world and my basic ability to reason for this story?:
***A sky-genie created the first man from dust and
the first woman from a rib-bone...both of whom were pre-wired to speak perfect hebrew. Then a talking snake tempted the woman to eat a magic apple, which of course gave her special knowledge. This made the sky-genie mad so he held a grudge against all humans for thousands of years?
Seriously people.....can we end this ridiculous charade?
2006-10-24 16:01:36 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
You forgot the part about him flooding the earth, and nailing his son to a cross...a real sick puppy!
Oh, yeah and the tower of babel, and the raining of frogs..those where pretty funny too.
Earl...are you suggesting that we are Not made of matter?
2006-10-24 16:04:25 · answer #1 · answered by trouthunter 4 · 8⤊ 1⤋
Ummm... well.... first of all... he's not a "sky-genie", he's God. I can see how you'd get the two confused...?!? Second, read the Bible. Adam and Eve were created from dust, yes. The dust of the earth that God created. Then, Eve was made from Adam's rib. No, they did not speak fluent Hebrew. It probably took them a while to learn how to communicate. Satan was the serpent that tempted Eve and she ate a piece of fruit from the tree that God specifically said to not eat from. That was when sin first entered the world. God is NOT holding a grudge against the world. He loves us more than you can imagine. Brush up on your Bible knowledge. Ask Jesus into your heart and ask for forgiveness of your sins. God wants to be in your life, let him. He loves you.
And no, I'm not some freak. I know what I'm talking about.
2006-10-24 16:09:37 · answer #2 · answered by juliefan 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Communists have tried to purge the Earth of creationists for the previous couple centuries. If there is not any God, then ought to makes precise, and that's the main premise at the back of communist dictatorships. It does take place at present in China and another places. i does no longer desire to work out the different area destroyed.
2016-12-16 13:56:28 · answer #3 · answered by hust 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The scientists are so intelligent that they change their stories everyday about something. I love their "research." A fine example, all of the food studies that flip flop each and every day! Give me a break. Oh wait, nothing is better than the genius at Eli Lilly who said scientists have no idea how SSRIs work on/in the brain, but they definately do cure depression somehow! HA HA HA...Oh, let me wipe the tears from my eyes so I can continue...
Now, according to my Biology teacher, they are all confused because they never considered that sulfur was a component of life and now that they have found it all around some under sea volcanoes...they are once again, stumped and rethinking their previous stance. Maybe it was the first form of life here on Earth!!
Scientists are all pricks who must suffer from varying forms of little man's syndrome because it's obvious that they are dying for attention. Stupid people like you that believe them feed their self esteem. Oh, but wait, it sounds like you have a lot in common because you are in here starting an argument with people who have faith in the Lord. Get a life and take your scientist friends with you. See you on judgement day, dumbass!
2006-10-24 16:15:58 · answer #4 · answered by Encyclopedia Allie 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It's more plausible then nothing all of a sudden exploding to "create" or "form" an organized universe that slowly evolved over billions of years. I've never seen something come from nothing and I've never seen a bomb explode and "create" life from the explosion.
Evolution sounds just as silly to me.
2006-10-24 16:14:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
how about you think about it this way:
****God, who was an Almighty and powerful Being, who had lived before there was anything besides Him, created a man. the man needed a companion, so God gave Adam a companion; He called her woman. they were both created by God, and anyone being created directly from God gets any "priviledges"; their priviledge was speaking hebrew. Then Satan, disguised as a snake to look tricky, tempted the woman to go against what God told her to do. we don't know why God told her not to eat the fruit, God just said don't. but she did, and her eyes were open, and so were Adam's and they saw they were naked. this is part of the knowledge they gained from the apple. This made God angry because He only gave them one rule to live by in their whole life, and they broke it. God is not holding a grudge against us, He just wants us to live right in His sight. not following His Bible is a sin, and following the Bible is not that difficult. don't be ridiculous about your made up version of a story from the Bible. cherish the Bible- it can save you from eternally burning in hell.
2006-10-24 16:09:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
For you who do not believe in a Creator, this is the way God describes you:
Long ago this observation was made in the Holy Scriptures about an idol worshiper who cut down a tree:
Isaiah. 44:15-17. And it has become [something] for man to keep a fire burning. So he takes part of it that he may warm himself. In fact he builds a fire and actually bakes bread. He also works on a god to which he may bow down. He has made it into a carved image, and he prostrates himself to it. 16 Half of it he actually burns up in a fire. Upon half of it he roasts well the flesh that he eats, and he becomes satisfied. He also warms himself and says: “Aha! I have warmed myself. I have seen the firelight.” 17 But the remainder of it he actually makes into a god itself, into his carved image. He prostrates himself to it and bows down and prays to it and says: “Deliver me, for you are my god.”
Is it not useless to look to a piece of wood or metal as God?
Even more useless;
Isaiah 29:16.The perversity of YOU men! Should the potter himself be accounted just like the clay? For should the thing made say respecting its maker: “He did not make me”? And does the very thing formed actually say respecting its former: “He showed no understanding”?
2006-10-24 16:30:43 · answer #7 · answered by papavero 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hahaha, I think Thats Pretty Funny.
2006-10-24 16:07:50 · answer #8 · answered by maguyver727 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I sometimes get the urge to say, "Okay time out you guys, stop playing, I'm serious. We really shouldn't be doing that..." and then I realize, "Crap, they're not playing, I forgot."
Small but Fierce's logic never fails to make me gag.
2006-10-24 16:10:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sorry max. Nice try, but paraphrasing it can't make it a more ridiculous story than it already is.
2006-10-24 16:05:25 · answer #10 · answered by Skeff 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋