2006-10-24 13:23:02 · 5 answers · asked by stamp81 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
It's more of a historical record in Rome's history.
2006-10-24 13:25:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mark makes reference to it, which is how archaeologists know Mark couldn't possibly have been written any earlier than 70 CE. This is a minimum of 40 years after the events it claims to have been an eye witness to. The other gospels were based on Mark, and were not "independent" records.
2006-10-24 20:26:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Mathew does. The oldest book in the new testament. So why did he wait 37 years to write about all these amazing things Jesus did? Was Jesus real?
2006-10-24 20:29:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the Gospels...
for example, Jesus' words were prophetic:
Mark 13:2 And Jesus answering said unto him, Seest thou these great buildings? there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.
2006-10-24 20:27:06 · answer #4 · answered by Bobby Jim 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Matthew 24
Mark 13
Luke 21
I found those from searching for the words: stone and left.
Hope this is what you were looking for!
2006-10-24 20:25:49 · answer #5 · answered by BekaJoy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋