wow, you're a regular aristotle.
2006-10-24 12:52:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Somthing has existed for all time clearly - no inventor or creator - No that makes no ense but it is obvious .
There is somthing that has never been created or made but always existed.
Does it have to be god ? Can't it be us and all you ee around you in constant change from one form to another ?
The big bang does not mean there has to be a god at all .
We and countless other souls and the matter we see could be the somthing that has existed for all time. There does not have to be a hierachy to it .
We just continually change from one form to another. No there is no way to prove I saw a ghost (I never have by the way) but there is also no way to prove that I saw an Oak tree yesterday on my way to work . Both statements could easily be dismissed with a good ole " well we have but your word to take for that don't we" .
There is no reason not to believe in ghosts though - they have been reported by EVERY nation for multiple thousands of years. - So has god - so why believe god and not a ghost ? Personel preference thats why .
Now the idea of a spirit world does not imply god either .
Why do you assume the spirit world to be any better orginised than the phisical one - socially that is ? Maybe god = King and since it is likely there are many kings and the spirit world in not a homonious homogenos group as we all dream it is .
You and I want to impose our rules on the spirit world and that is where is could lead to insight or a closed loop who knows
2006-10-24 13:01:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i do no longer understand your actuality and singularity concept in any respect and many the ideas you're sharing seems to return from everywhere approximately no longer something consistent . It in basic terms seems a jumble of you have heard yet yet to appreciate. Now that reported God vs vast Bang. evaluate for as quickly as in basic terms this. If there's a god and god desperate to create with the help of imploding or exploding some thing Say an atom or some thing even smaller, and reported god then created vast Bang. is this a threat that the two could be authentic? The some thing from no longer something concept seems to in wonderful condition the two god and massive Bang different than in that concept vast Band might have had to return from God extremely than it in basic terms being a fluke of nature. have you ever yet to totally understand nature yet. i've got no longer nor have I yet to appreciate god or the coolest judgment of that existence. So the place does that carry us? Nowhere ok i'm performed
2016-10-02 22:21:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
TO MANY children God is a very real, rather imposing figure, but not at all frightening. When children, under the age of ten, were asked to write to God, their letters revealed directness, a charm and reverence. For example, one child wrote:
“Dear God, when you started the earth and put people there and all the animals and grass and the stars did you get very tired? I have a lot of other questions too.” To this child, it is obvious that God is real. The child does not know much about God, but he is willing to learn, for he has “a lot of other questions.”
Does this mean that it is childish to believe that God is a real person who is concerned with earth’s affairs? Is such a God merely the figment of youthful imagination? Is he only fictional, much like Santa Claus?
Well, consider: Marvelous design and orderliness are everywhere evident in the universe. “It is enough for me,” observed the late scientist Albert Einstein, “to reflect upon the marvelous structure of the universe, which we can dimly perceive, and to try humbly to comprehend even an infinitesimal part of the intelligence manifest in nature.” Of what is this superb orderliness and tremendous intelligence evidence?
From our own experience we know that intelligence is associated with the mind. And we know that the mind is associated with a brain in the body of an individual. Thus, this great mind responsible for the design and orderliness of the universe must be that of the Supreme Being, the great Person who is God, with a definite body and individuality and powers.
2006-10-24 13:10:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by papavero 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You'd be surprised how these two things coincide! The Big Bang Theory and GOD go hand-in-hand, believe it or not!
"there was nothing... then there was something" by saying this, you've just proven the miracle of GOD! Only GOD is able to create something out of nothing, and that's the truth humans have extremely difficult time understanding.
2006-10-24 13:02:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The One True God is Divine Reality from eternity to eternity.
Big Bang is only a scientific theory which will be replaced by other intelligent scientific theories.
We need to humbly learn continuously to advance with new scientific theories to know more about God and not to stick to one theory as firm belief in eternal truth.
The purpose of man on earth is to build an ever-advancing civilization, and not to blindly stick to anything being labelled as science or religion.
2006-10-24 13:05:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
God used the Big Bang in order to create everything, so yes you're right --- nothing can't create something. God was made by nobody, because he is God, therefore he has always existed. He is outside space and time, therefore time is nothing to him. He can transcend it.
2006-10-24 13:17:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by . 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Personally, I would say both. It was the Big Bang that created the universe, but God started it.
As for God's origins, I feel that if you can't take the idea that he *just appeared*, then you'll never know. You either believe or you don't.
2006-10-24 13:01:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by ldnester 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
All the problems go away if you accept that existence is probabilistic, not deterministic. This is what quantum physics proposes, and it is supported by experimental evidence. Thus the existence of something is not dependent on a preceding event, or the prior existence of something - it is simply a matter of probability. It may sound weird, and hard to believe, but the universe is as it is, regardless of how hard it is for us to understand or believe it.
2006-10-24 13:05:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nothing 'banged together' to create the universe. There was nothing but a quantum vacuum that collapsed into a lower energy state. The excess potential energy was released as a flood of particles and spacetime. There wasn't a singularity either (the singularity concept was buried about a decade ago).
2006-10-24 12:52:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
** Ramble Ramble Ramble **
What? Thanks for sharing your beliefs. I was thoroughly.. umm.. enlig...no...entert....no... annoyed... yeah, that's it.
UNSCIENTIFICAL? Where'd you pull that word from?
If you were in a jungle with no talk of god and Jesus...? If you were a a primitive man living in the middle of the jungle, with no education and little intelligence, you would make up your own god that would explain all the things you were scared of or unsure of.
That's how pesky god rumours start.
2006-10-24 12:59:07
·
answer #11
·
answered by umwut? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋