I don't mean blantalaly ,but if 75% of crimes are done by minorities, i don't think its all that bad to use racial profiling, with a probable cause of course.
2006-10-24 08:18:40 · 13 answers · asked by Matthew B 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
Fool, Fools, Fools!
2006-10-31 20:53:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The words evoke such negative connotations in policing that they are not even to be spoken.
But the use of profiling is still being used in policing. For instance you see a poorly dressed man in a neighborhood of affluent families. What would you do? Of course you'd stop him and ID him. Does this mean he'll be arrested? I don't think so unless you have probable cause to do so.
The idea is to look at the circumstances for what they are. If it doesn't match up to what's supposed to be then get out of the car and check it out. Does that make it wrong? No it's just good policing.
2006-10-31 06:50:25 · answer #2 · answered by Eddie 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think it works a lot of the time, but not in all cases.
I read an article about why cab drivers in cities don't like to pick up minority people at night. They said because the vast majority of robberies were done by minority people. So the minorities that aren't robbers suffer, but I can't blame the cab drivers.
And how many elderly white women have ever been terrorists? Yet they're subjected to the same scrutiny as young Muslim men at the airports.
Doesn't make sense to me. It's flaunting common sense in the face of political correctness.
2006-10-24 08:26:59 · answer #3 · answered by Sean 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Care greater the recommendations than the race. Now you have white switched over to Islam and bear in recommendations the meanest are the single we informed in Europa or in the States the whiter ....with a small bart and a particular physique gesture. we could care them first in our international locations we could sparkling our very own returned backyard first befor to combat at yet another place.No traitor at the back of us on an identical time as combating no malicious program different than at Yahoo ..... once you hire a muslim at everywhere you enable enter the wolff into the sheepbarnes. all of us comprehend them for lot greater time conflict of Poitiers 737 !!!! close up roockies your feets are glued . the undeniable fact which you talk English do no longer prouve which you have seen all. My accountability is to coach you have been are placed the main issues. A bon entendeur salut!
2016-10-16 08:40:47 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
'Profiling' works.
'Racial profiling' is a term used by morons who are opposed to profiling. These idiots feel safe in their own little worlds and don't mind that predators are roaming free. This enables them to FEEL good about the fact that the occasional innocent person isn't inconvenienced. Nice tradeoff, huh?
2006-10-24 08:29:24 · answer #5 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
if you have probable cause you wuld not need to racial profile. I don't racial profile, but look at the statistics.
2006-10-24 14:22:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
shhh...racial profiling does work...but youre not allowed to say it does...you are only allowed to say you cant racial profile...why? because it works
ACLU logic
2006-10-24 08:21:23 · answer #7 · answered by smitty031 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋
You David Duke Jr?
2006-10-24 08:26:30 · answer #8 · answered by robert m 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Yes it works. Take for example this conundrum....terrorists are Muslims, not granny ladies and small children.
2006-10-24 08:22:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
you speak like :
outside the killings washington DC has the lowest crime rate...
2006-10-24 08:34:49 · answer #10 · answered by StupendousMan 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋