Can religious people accurately describe the scientific method?

Question

Please take this opportunity to indicate how well informed you have become regarding the process of discovery and correction in science.

Please summarize the scientific method.

Answer 1

You go first , as a matter of fact I am going to ask this as a question to all of you.Your question can't be answered because the evolution theory has changed and will continue to change because evolution is just a theory.I am putting this on my watch list and expect you to provide all of us with the correct theory what ever that is this week.good-luck.

Answer 2

Of course we can describe it. What's interesting is how evolutionists don't use it. Shouldn't they be looking at every possibility? And yet they dismiss what is very plausible simply because they have their own mindset and a theology built around that mindset. Alfred De Grazia's "The Scientific Reception System" showed how scientists refused to acknowledge Dr. Velikovsky's theory that Venus was hot, for instance. Their reasoning paralleled the opposition with Christianity today. When people close their ears to true science, the scientific method may as well go out the window.

Answer 3

Can scientist accurately define spirituality? Science is a religion in its own right, as it put faith in prooving and depending on the "laws of nature" to define everything else, including other religion. I would say the first step in any scientific method is to keep an open mind, then comes with your hypothesis...and blah blah. Scientific method as a philosophical argument and means of proving/disproving can be found in any philosophy textbook, or even in high school science textbook. What does knowing scientific methods and summarization prove "religious" people know scientificmethod well? Can't they just copy verbatim and make you look like a fool?

Answer 4

Why would religious people be any less well informed of the scientific method than would an atheist? We all went to the same public schools. And I also noticed that not all scientists are atheists, and many atheists are not scientists.

To answer you question, yes I can articulate the scientific method. Are you writing a book or something?

Answer 5

technological expertise is technological expertise. the regulations do no longer replace because of who does the paintings. i have seen some truly impressive analyze carried out by technique of H.S. scholars and some crap revealed by technique of professional scientists, so there is a few overlap, in spite of the actual incontrovertible truth that no longer a lot. you ought to outline "scientifically-derived archives". in case you ensue upon something by technique of coincidence and be conscious it heavily, those observations are in basic terms as valid as ones from a laboratory try. All technological expertise is subject to correction and refining. it is what distinguishes it from faith. something that cannot be falsified isn't technological expertise. i do not care if the finished universe holds someone in severe regard. If i don't think of a lot of that man or woman's ideas, I stay unconvinced. I do enable for the prospect that the man might want to be accurate; I do in basic terms not base any of my personal paintings on it.

Answer 6

I really don't know much at all about the scientific method. You may call me ignorant, but I choose to be ignorant to this subject. When someone can give me absolute proof that there is no God(which no one will ever be able to prove) then maybe I will open my eyes to such a notion.

Answer 7

Verify by observation and duplication


All science is from God...thus all science is good...God's science is what he put in place to govern the functions of the universe mankind has not even come close to figguring out all of God's science... let-a-lone how to properly use it... it is man mucking up God's science that is causing so much suffering in the world... allof the polution and hunger and resistant to treatment deseases...world hunger...and on andonandonandon....

If it were not for man's greed and ego dominating scientific inquiry, all of mankind could live in peace and plenty as God intended.

God makes the rules...break(missuse) God's rules and suffer the concequences.

Answer 8

1. observation, 2. hypothesis, 3. test hypothesis through experimentation, 4. repeat steps 2 and 3 until experiment and hypothesis are consistent. At which point, hypothesis becomes theory. The theory is the framework in which observations are explained and predicitons are made.

Answer 9

The scientific method is a way to figure things out based on things that you can observe, measure, and test. Inductive logic is used with the scientific method, but not always.

Answer 10

I never measure. I always just do it by intuition. A dash of this a dash of that. That is the mother taught me to cook and that is the way I taught my daughter. But Gracie doesn't seem to cook as much because she wanted to be a business woman and wear pants downtown. I think that is fine, but I hope she will settled down before she's out of birthing age.