2006-10-24 06:13:11 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Regarding the use of the words? I dunno... I think people get the wrong idea when they hear the word evolution... it brings to mind a concept usually very different than what evolution really is.
2006-10-24 06:15:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Creationists would not use the word evolution for any true facts, because evolution is the opposite of Creation.
2006-10-24 06:18:42 · answer #2 · answered by Thumbs down me now 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My personal religious beliefs permit Creationists and others to (mis)use the word evolution, at whim.
2006-10-24 10:18:00 · answer #3 · answered by limendoz 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution is voodoo science that has never been proven that is why it is still a theory, which according to the dictionary means a guess.
Life can't evolve from non-life, so evolution is exposed as being wrong since it can't explain how the very first life form came into existence.
Darwin has made a monkey out of all those evolutionists.
2006-10-24 06:32:57 · answer #4 · answered by Born Again Christian 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
We see version that seems lots like the thought of evolution in chilly viruses according to annum, yet we've yet to tutor the thought because it applies to greater suitable, greater slowly-reproducing animals like cows or people. it is nevertheless in basic terms an thought, insofar because it states that significant survival-improving variations can come into existence (the two via mutation or intentional breeding), be chosen -with the help of the ambience- and be exceeded directly to offspring in certainly one of those way that the tip consequence after 3-4 mutations won't seem something like the unique. people are nevertheless people (we've not "progressed" into something yet, and we nevertheless seem in basic terms like our ancestors quite a few generations back) and we've so little wisdom of a few of our structures (exceedingly issues like the recommendations and human wisdom) that we will no longer pinpoint evolutionary variations happening on a small scale... we've not got the historic information to pinpoint variations on a great scale (say, case in point, fewer human beings being born with webbed feet via fact the introduction of sandals).
2016-10-02 22:02:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is that a problem? Am I not supposed to say Evolution?
2006-10-24 06:15:27 · answer #6 · answered by Char 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I personally believe that they can say evolution all they want.
2006-10-24 06:17:40 · answer #7 · answered by Justsyd 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have no religious beliefs, by response is normally just to sigh.
2006-10-24 06:15:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Creation is not over. Evolution is creation..
2006-10-24 06:15:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
i think its a croc b/c they dont even attempt to understand it. they dont even understand natural selection, the basis of evolution. to tell you the truth, they dont really understand anything that is non-fictional.
2006-10-24 06:16:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋