It should be "succulency".
2006-10-24 05:11:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can see your logic, but it's not a word. It loses its succulence.
2006-10-24 05:06:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by danaluana 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
ummm dictionary? I mean you have one on Yahoo and you could search on the internet, or (God forbid) we use the book form to look it up. You could have already found it, by the time you posted your question and read the answers.
Not mad at you, just strange the questions that are asked that the person could find the answer easier by just doing it themselves and then know for a fact.
2006-10-24 05:11:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Barbara C 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope
2006-10-25 03:42:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by deebradley2000 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If it existed shouldn't it be succulency?
2006-10-24 05:11:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by kerrykinsmalosevich 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sounds logical but no it isn't a word. Ask someone to buy you dictionary thesaraus for Christmas.
2006-10-26 05:18:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have noticed the questions on Yahoo Answers have increased in stupidicity and nonsencolosticy.
2006-10-26 02:08:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by J D 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Succulence.
Although I suppose something is a word if it has a fairly standardized spelling and everyone can easily know its meaning. Sort of like "D'oh" is a word.
2006-10-24 05:10:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Brian L 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
succulant means full of juice......or interesting.
2006-10-24 05:13:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by nessa0505 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
That is a bestest question and gooder than any I have read.
2006-10-24 20:12:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sue Chef 6
·
0⤊
1⤋