WHERE WERE THE BNP?
2006-10-24 00:34:23 · 20 answers · asked by f**kwit 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
most of you are so shallow.
the british national party is the only party that is 100% non racist. they do not tollerate it and i challenge you to read the content of the manefesto.
it is the media and government that spin and spread malice about the only true freedom party. more and more people are turning to the bnp ...our time is coming
2006-10-24 06:13:50 · answer #1 · answered by muttentrumpet 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
It is the government that is threatening free speech and the legal system by letting the people we have allowed into our country do whatever they want when they want. If things keep happening as they are we wont have a country that we can call our own. Dont people realise that the muslims are going to take over the world. I dont mean any harm to anyone but the writing is on the wall. I was in Spain a few weeks ago and went to the Valencian fiesta which celebrated the christians and moors. It was a wonderful display and everyone had a great time. The next day in the newspapers the headlines read that the muslim community were offended by the celebrations and called for it to be banned. Who the hell do they think they are. If they dont like the ways and heritage of others countries they maybe they should think about staying in their own country.
2006-10-24 00:57:14 · answer #2 · answered by BWgirl 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Where were the BNP? Two of them were remanded in custody.
BNP man faces explosives charge
A former British National Party election candidate and a dentist have appeared in court accused of possessing an explosive substance.
Robert Cottage, 49, of Talbot Street, Colne, Lancashire, and David Jackson, 62, of Trent Road, Nelson, Lancashire, were charged under the Explosive Substances Act 1883 after chemical components were allegedly found at Cottage's house.
Cottage stood for the BNP in this year's local elections in Colne.
Both men were remanded in custody at Preston Crown Court. No application for bail was made for either man.
The case was adjourned until January 15, 2007 for a plea and case management hearing.
A provisional trial date has been set for February 12 at Manchester Crown Court. It will be held before a High Court judge and is expected to last one and a half weeks
2006-10-24 01:41:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not there because it would have offended the Muslim community which made the whole thing pointless. However i really dont want to see the BNP voted in as its too extreme. There has got to be a way where everyone can live relatively peacefully which means the Muslim community must reign its war mongers in as well. By war mongers i mean 'hooky' and other extremists who should be deported. Funny how they managed to extradite the Enron officials but couldnt get rid of 'Hooky'
2006-10-24 00:45:49 · answer #4 · answered by bootycreord 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because the BNP threaten free speech more.
A mosque was attacked near where I live last week thanks to Jack Straw's comments. The BNP has also been leafleting against this mosque locally in the past two weeks. Doesn't take a George Bush to put two and two together...
2006-10-24 04:03:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
the BNP are not representative of anything, they are just scum.
the show was a pile of rubbish. they invited an equally split audience and, at the end, got an equally split vote.
muslims see anything that exposes their faults as an insult...so what's new.
you cant claim the women are mistreated because they choose to be mistreated by their religion.
you cant claim the koran incites violence, because there are other verses which dont incite violence
While there are still god botherers making claims and pulling strings on both sides of the fence, I do not expect any 'proper' debate on the muslim problem..............and yes, i do see muslims as a problem, along with all other extremist religions
2006-10-24 02:17:47 · answer #6 · answered by Vinni and beer 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They had the extreme muslim group their so why not an extreme group such as the BNP. Because even in a debate their worried about offending muslims. So yes they are threatening free speech.
2006-10-24 03:04:02 · answer #7 · answered by madnesscon 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I didn't. I don't watch Channel 4 when Monday Night Football is on.
Besides, left wing crap or not, they have the right to spew their stupidity.
2006-10-24 01:09:22 · answer #8 · answered by Namtrac 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think of it's time to alter the locks! "Yahoo Dullards: this could nicely be a question... no longer chatting... please be conscious that it is asked in question format, in an open community, to all at YA! If for some reason you get puzzled and sense it is chatting, be at liberty to locate using an vehicle battery & jumper cables on quite some physique areas. Have a effective day" - Too humorous!
2016-10-16 08:19:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was pretty crap, im dubious about the audience poll at the end I mean was it really proportionate to the actual country at all. and the audience did my head in clapping everyone for everything i wanted to throw something at the telly.
2006-10-24 00:45:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I just remember that stupid, ignorant, middleclass christian woman in the audience, that completley ruined the entire debate with her "this is a Christian country" bullshit. God I wanted to slap her. Religion is a threat to freedom of speech. Ban all religion.
2006-10-24 02:31:38 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋