Is the Islamic veil, in Western countries, voluntary apartheid, or just refusal to really migrate?

Question

I'm curious. My Arab grandpa, a migrant to Australia in the late 19thC declared "you belong to the dirt that feeds you, and the community you share it with" . We've lived by that, ever since.

Answer 1

There is a great deal of sense in what your grandpa said. It is a good idea to assimilate into the culture of the country in which you choose to live. That means speaking the native language and adopting the native customs and culture. If a person does not wish to do these things he may continue to live in his country of origin.

Some countries such as the United States are particularly tolerant of diverse cultures including translating government documents into various languages to make them easier to understand for those who do not speak English well. The religious practices and clothing are similarly tolerated. A person should abide by the laws and customs of the country in which he chooses to live.

In Southeast Michigan where I live, if an Arab or Chinese person wants to get a driver's license he may request to take the test in his language. Similarly, he may request welfare forms translated in his language. It is possible to live in Dearborn or Hamtramck Michigan and dress as a person would in Saudi Arabia and not even necessary to speak English. That is the extreme freedom in the United States. Even the call to prayer is broadcast five times a day and halal food is served in school. These are things that have been done to accomodate the Muslim population.

Answer 2

I believe they're similar to plenty of ladies I recognise, regularly sticking their noses into areas they do not belong. You're proper approximately the veils. When the UK is defined as a unfastened nation it doesn't suggest you'll do what you desire. Technically there is not any such factor as freedom however that is a different rant. Respect for the customs of this nation is agiven. I would not ask a ladies to take hers off in Britain however I comprehend why this can be a hindrance for ID and I believe it is a well thought to do what France performed and make it unlawful. If there's a hindrance with faith for the ladies worried then they must train that during a nation that permits it. Rastafarians for example insist hashish is facet in their faith and if you happen to seem into it, it's. If I used to be a rastararian there don't seem to be many areas on Earth in which I am legally entitled to pursue my faith via lighting fixtures a spliff. Sure as hell would not check out it at any place within the core east.

Answer 3

does wearing the veil mean an apartheid to you? I think the comparison is too unfair. Why dont u then ask Christians not to wear crosses??Why dont u try and see it differently, that a woman who covers is sending a clear message that her true value is in her mind.

We always speak about freedom of expression, part and parcel of which is freedom of Religion.

Answer 4

i agree with you to an extent....... now many muslimahs have traded in their traditional clothing for loose western clothes and things of that nature.... however, it is not okay to lose your morals or your faith. if you have a true faith in your religion why would that change b/ of where you are. this is to say ill be christian in the usa muslim if i go to saudi and hindu when traveling through india?..... i am who i am all day no matter where i am. the clothing style the language the food might change, my faith and my principles do not

peace be with you

Answer 5

Dunno. There is massive debate about this subject in the UK at the moment. and I mean massive.
Checkout
http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?threadID=4272&start=0&&&edition=1&ttl=20061024100837

and then spend some time surfing around the BBC news site. This subject has been going on for a couple of months here and has sparked enormous attention