Corruption should be banned or not? If so why?

Answer 1

If this pertains to the government, then I'd say that it is obviously already banned. The problem is to prevent it.

Answer 2

Corruption is already banned but people are still practising it. The giver gives for want of work to be done and the receiver receives to perform the job just because he either has the power to do the job or the authority to make it happen. So it is clear that corruption exists either while performing a job or authority to make the job happen. If most of the services are automated and if the user has the option of accessing them online this can be avoided. There should be a database available wherein the User can log into and provide the details of the corrupt. Endless to say the attitude of the people siting in the place to provide the service should be clean and good which is the only way to avoid corruption. Each and every penny either earned or spent should be accounted and hence corruption should be banned and the corrupt should be punished to the maximum extent.

Answer 3

Dear gujjuru, its not true to say that everyone is corrupt but still there are many corrupt people all over the world. Corruption is banned but can u ban on corrupt people. Its not in corrupt people's hand to stop corruption, its in public's hand to stop it. We keep on saying that corruption must be banned but when it comes to us to act on it, it doesn't work. Suppose a person have some work in some office and wants his work to be done fast then either he has to give bribe or he needs some approach. Approach can work sometimes but bribe always work as it is hard cash that goes in corrupt people's hands. So intead of keep on visiting these offices again and again, people prefer to give bribe as they r also going to waste money in coming to these offices. So, unless we start this protest that we wont bribe, this culture can never stop. It is never ending process. Only sometimes corrupt people are caught by police with the help of some sensitive people who want to stop this fashion. So we are the ones who have to stop corruption, it is in our hands.

Answer 4

Corruption is banned but it still happens renderring the situation corrupt!

Answer 5

By definition isn't corruption already banned.

Answer 6

You cannot ban corruption because it is inborn human trait. You can stop it by punishing the corrupt by hanging them without trial.

Answer 7

corruption is an ideal, not a true item, so you can't really ban it... it's more the fact that we have to crack down on officials who are corrupt to keep corruption out of our government

Answer 8

ur question itself is quite rediculous.
it shoud be banned.
but banners themselves are corrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrruuuuuuuuuuuuppppppppppppt. to such an extent that it cannot be banned.
there is 'or not' in that issue.
it spoils the image in the society, though the corrupt travel in mercedes benz, areoplanes but they are like the tiny creatures of nature like cockroaches who don't have thier identity and dignity among the honest who suffer.
they may be praised in the front but at thier back the people who suffer curse them like anything. thier families are not stable, children gone with the wind, thier life is shattered, but being corrupt they feel that atleast they have money and they can spend.
the wrong feeling among themselves is they have money and with money they can buy education, medicine and many more.
the money earned by means of corruption also goes for useless means.
in thier homes..... (i call house only not home) always there is friction, money flowing into somebody's dangerous diseases,legal matters.etc.
horrible, horrifying are those who are corrupt.
they not only spoil thier lives but spoil the very image of the society.
they are the unfit for a living in the beautiful world of God.
it is better to be hungry and die rather than becoming corrrrupt and buying Hungary.(the country)

Answer 9

First we have find out the defination of the corruption the intention of this paper is to classify the various forms of corruption in order to operationalise the concept for analytical and practical purposes. The paper outlines different forms of corruption, and defines it as a particular state- society relationship, making a distinction between political corruption and bureaucratic corruption.
The main forms of corruption are bribery, embezzlement, fraud and extortion. Even when these concepts are partly overlapping and at times interchangeable with other concepts, some of the basic characteristics of corruption can be identified through these concepts.

The decisive role of the state is reflected in most definitions of corruption, which is conventionally understood and referred to as the private wealth-seeking behaviour of someone who represents the state and the public authority.

Political or grand corruption takes place at the highest levels of political authority. It is when the politicians and political decision-makers, who are entitled to formulate, establish and implement the laws in the name of the people, are themselves corrupt, and use the political power they are armed with to sustain their power, status and wealth.
The question “who benefits from corruption” could, however, be taken one step further. In aggregate terms corrupt practices will generate a flow of resources either from the society to the state (“extractive” corruption, or corruption “from above”), or from the state to the society (“redistributive” corruption, or corruption “from below”). In what can be called the theory of redistributive corruption, the state is the weaker part in the state-society relationship. Analysts tend to have weak states in mind when they are focusing on the “subversive” groups and their “state destructive” capacity, i.e. the degenerative effects of corruption on the state institutions and the national economy.

Concluding Remarks To make a strict and narrow definition of corruption that restrict corruption to particular agents, sectors or transactions, like corruption as a deviation from the formal rules that regulate the behaviour of public officials, can be handy for fighting corruption when the problem is limited. But because narrow (legal) definitions may ignore vital parts of the problem, like the lack of political will to curb corruption in certain regimes, broader and more open-ended definitions, like corruption in terms of power abuse, will have to be applied to address the situations of pervasive and massive corruption. Even when the effect of democratisation in curtailing corruption is still much debated and not very strong according to available statistics, one basic and practical argument is that corruption can only be reversed by democratising the state. Economic and political competition, transparency and accountability, coupled with the democratic principles of checks and balances, are the necessary instruments to restrict corruption and power abuse

Answer 10

just start from you to ban corruption , never give money to solve your work. that chain will remove corruption from our country.