Be honest, and be serious Please.
2006-10-23 18:43:11 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Sorry, I don't. It is a theory. If God made man in the image of himself, that would mean he was a monkey.
Genetic information is lost when a species mutates. Not gained.
the Bible told us how things evolve. A species will reproduce after itself. animals in the dog family can reproduce, after themselves.
Evolution is a lie, taught in schools, but there is a bigger agenda. It forms the basis of how people see life, live life, and treat people.
Research "lies in the text books" by Kevin Hovind. He is a science teacher, who uses science and proof, to explain the lie "evolution." the more you look at science, the more you realize it supports creation, and Noahs Flood.
One example ive been using. They want us to believe the world is millions of years old. They use circular reasoning. You ask " how do you know how old that fossil is?" they say "by the layer of earth it was found in." You ask "how do you know how old the layer of earth is." They say "by the fossils found in them." Oh?
Its not logical at all.
The pictures we see of monkeys evolving are that. Pictures.
Men have been busted putting parts of human skulls together with parts of monkey skulls. The list goes on and on and on.
Look into Kevins research.
2006-10-23 19:01:00 · answer #1 · answered by chara 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Okay, I'm going to be semantically difficult here, but it's important. People should not "believe" in evolution in the sense that people "believe" in God. That provokes buffoonish theists to state that evolution takes as much faith to believe as a belief in God, which is nonsense. What people should to is consider which set of ideas are best supported by the evidence. Both, it could be argued, are incomplete. But evolution is a lot, lot less incomplete than the Creation story. The only way you can take that on board is by belief. Because it has nothing else to recommend it.
2006-10-24 03:30:15 · answer #2 · answered by Bad Liberal 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
GOD believes in it. He started it. he will keep the process of evolution going. He knows only that is the right way. He is not interested in what bible or any scripture says. He has written a new edition. Through Charles Darwin. Darwins successors found more about evolution and the studies will go on for more time. The earth is a couple of billion years old and to study, invstigate all these it takes time. God wants human beings to learn, evolve into a intelligent species, adpat to their environments. God also wants man to face the consequences of spoiling the environment he lives in. Evolution into a healthy species is the only answer. That is why god gave every being the grey matter. God wants man to evolve to that extent where the difference between god and man disappears. that day we can say " Tatvamasi" . It means "I am that".
Evolution is meant only for intelligent being. Those who follow churches and holy scriptures will never evolve. they will become a cess pool. Growth is life. To grow it needs to move from one stage to another. that is a part of evolution. nobody has come into this wold like a barbie doll on the shop shelf, fully grown. even i started from a single cell called zygote in my mother's womb, then spent 9 months there and then as baby born into this world. it took many years for me to reach what i am today. isn't that a better example of how evolution can be explained.
2006-10-23 19:48:43 · answer #3 · answered by Raja Krsnan 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Short answer...yes.
With all of the evidence (easily and readily verified) supporting evolution, why would you not accept evolution as fact? The fossil record and verified accounts depicting evolutionary changes within the last 100 years give credibility to evolution.
The word theory, when used in the context of "the theory of evolution" or "the theory of gravity" doesn't mean guess. It is used for a series of statements that have been taken from the hypothetical, and by nature of testing, and verification, are accepted as fact. Hypothesis is the closest word to "guess" in a scientific fashion. It's a common game of semantics for the church to use the non-technical definition of the word theory, in order to discredit that which science has proven. It's all a matter of context.
Hopefully, I'll address this before certain terms start cropping up. If you believe in micro-evolution, then you believe in macro-evolution too. The only distinction between the 2 was brought about by both the church and biblical scholars, who understood what they were seeing, but in order to maintain the church, had to find a way to discredit it. Macro-evolution is the culmination of millions of micro-evolutionary changes. The biblical scientists, knowing that most of these changes were to tissues that would not survive the fossilization process, started using the micro and macro prefixes to further this agenda.
2006-10-23 18:57:04 · answer #4 · answered by Bill K Atheist Goodfella 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The goalposts have shifted by way of the years. the standard anti-evolution line now's "we have faith in microevolution, yet no longer macroevolution". meaning that they settle for the thought mutations ensue and get integrated into the species so it could substitute in small strategies. yet there is a few mechanism which says "wait, this could be one step too some distance, i could might desire to be labeled as a clean species". that prevents the small changes from transforming into great ones. Or something. it extremely is like asserting I settle for which you would be able to take any form of steps in the direction of the subsequent city, despite the fact that if it extremely is impossible which you would be able to honestly attain the recent city. you spot above yet another standard line: "there is not any information for evolution". See how common that's to brush aside one hundred fifty years of information? Poof! it extremely is long previous in a stroke! by no skill befell!
2016-11-25 01:36:42 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. People "believe in" evolution. Its actually not something to "believe in" as if its a faith. It is science, and it is something to be understood rather than "believed in".
If people want to refuse to accept it that's their business.
This question comes up over and over and over again on here. I don't understand why it is such a difficult thing to imagine or understand or why it would necessarily conflict with any belief in a Creator. Yes - it conflicts with what the bible says if people take what the bible says literally.
2006-10-23 18:48:52 · answer #6 · answered by WhiteLilac1 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Does anybody NOT? Unless they're ignorant or brainwashed so badly they won't look at the facts. I guess it's largely a matter of intelligence and education. No doubt some people somewhere still believe the world is flat, or was all created in a particular number of days by a supernatural being. One can only sympathise.
2006-10-23 18:47:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
To a point,yes. But not when it involves human. Human are divine beings accountable for everything he/she does . Human does not merely exist because if he/she is mere, why do we ask why am i here? Everything happens for a reason and because of that all that one feels validates the ever present feeling deep inside - that we are all here for a reason.
2006-10-23 20:30:15 · answer #8 · answered by aishah 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's ok not to believe in evolution on the large scale, but you have to give evolution it's props on the small scale though.
2006-10-23 18:46:52 · answer #9 · answered by alwaysmoose 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No. I believe in species variation (micro-evolution, for lack of a better word). I believe God made all the kinds of animals, and through breeding we got different species. It is the only type of evolution that is possible.
2006-10-23 18:49:38 · answer #10 · answered by p2of9 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋