I have not heard that one but I have heard the deeper you go at the moment of climax the more likely you are to have a boy because male sperm are sprinters and female sperm are more stamina oriented.
I'd say pull back a bit. There are enough boys in the world with China and India, etc aborting female children on purpose. The ratios are really getting out of wack. In some places it is around 117 boys to every 100 girls.
Edit: There could be some merit to what you say in that if you abstain you are more likely to have aggressive sex which if the theory of male sperm being sprinters is correct could culminate in a higher percentage of males being conceived.
2006-10-23 18:15:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Love of Truth 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
My Friend,
A fact you may know already is that every time intercourse results in a conception, there is a 50% chance of having a boy - so the frequency that you have sex doesn't matter. What may matter more, is where you live, and who you are...genetically, and in other ways. There seems to be little doubt that in some populations, more boys are born, and in others, more girls. This fact does not negate the 50/50 odds at conception. I'm sure you've heard that worldwide slightly more girls are born - this is thought to be b/c girls are genetically hardier than boys, and so their survival to birth exceeds that of boys.
What has been found to be true is that the father's sperm determines sex - in the current understanding of how it all works. However, you may also believe that there is another factor involved...such as God's will. (Something I personally believe in).
With today's reproductive technology, it is more possible to plan and "arrange" for a boy - as I'm sure you know. But, left to nature's plan, you have to play the odds just like everyone else bouncing on the bed springs.
Good luck, and may you be worthy of a baby's love.
Peace!
ThirstQuencher.
2006-10-24 01:22:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by thirstquencher 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually it's the other way around, kinda. You see the sperm that carry the Y(boy making) chromosome swim faster than the X(girl making)chromosomes. But the X-carrying sperm live longer than the Y-carrying sperm. In order to increase your chance of concieving a male child, you need to have sex as close to the time of ovulation as possible( same day as ovulation).
2006-10-24 01:29:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by ladyg 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
NO. Unles you go to a doctor and have some genetic manipulation, some very EXPENSIVE genetic maniulation done, there is NO way to choose the gender of a child. It's basically random.
2006-10-24 01:10:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by kveldulfgondlir 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, cause it means that if you don't have sex very often with a woman basically you are not that much attracted and thus it is the men who are not fully attracted to their gals who usually produce boys.
2006-10-24 01:35:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mr ME 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No but if you have sex as close to ovulation as possible you're more likely to have a boy. If you want to have a girl, you have sex one time about 3-4 days before ovulation and then that's all .....it's all in a famous fertility book.
2006-10-24 01:12:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by chnchita 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
thats the dumbest question tonight.
sex depends on whether or not the sperm gives up an x or y chromosome. its a roll of dice.
Now my suggestion is you avoid sex at all cost
2006-10-24 01:08:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by gYPSY B 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Dont listen to that mumbo jumbo!!
We tried both times for boys and we now have 2 beautiful girls!! lol
no more babies here!! not risking anymore girls!! hehe
2006-10-24 01:16:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. It has nothing to do with it.
You are more likely to have a boy naturally, its the way in which your sperm travels that contains the male gene. Male sperm travels faster.
mandy
good luck though, you are wanting a boy?
I myself would love to have a girl..............!
2006-10-24 01:15:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by cking_pOise... 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hummmm, never heard that one....I was thought it had everything to do with gene expression
2006-10-24 01:09:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Diamond in the Rough 6
·
0⤊
0⤋