English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They say you will lose a pound of fat if you burn 3,500 calories more than you take in. In this world of processed foods, is it possible for a pound of food to have more than 3,500 calories? This question is actually more thought provoking than it appears. Thanks in advance.

2006-10-23 15:20:05 · 11 answers · asked by smashingyoungthang 1 in Health Diet & Fitness

11 answers

I believe a gram of fat provides approximately 9 kcal of energy, so at 9 kcal/gram (453.6 gram/lb.), one pound of fat would provide 4082.4 kcal of energy , or 4082 food "calories." Interesting question that--I never tried to figure it before!

2006-10-23 15:30:38 · answer #1 · answered by Black Dog 6 · 1 0

Well... let's convert this to units more popularly used for food. 3500 Calories per pound is a little more than 218 Calories per ounce. The capital C is important, because it distinguishes dietary calories from actual calories - a Calorie is actually a thousand calories, or a kcal.

There are foods that are more than this target number, but not a lot of them. If you could drink pure canola or olive oil, for example, they have 240 Calories per ounce. Ick. If you ate an ounce of pure dietary fat, it would have 255 Calories per ounce (ick on that one too).

Most candies have only 100-150 Calories per ounce. Chips are usually 150 per oz. Even liquor is only 64 Calories per ounce. Nuts, on the other hand, are usually 160-200.

Your body stores energy efficiently!

2006-10-23 15:29:36 · answer #2 · answered by Doctor Why 7 · 1 0

The weight of food has nothing to do with the calories it contains. Carrots are heavy but low in calories.

A calorie is the amount of energy it takes to heat an amount of liquid one degree, that's all.

You must burn 3500 of those calories to lose 1 pound of body fat, unless you pick a thermogenic diet like Kimkins. Members lose weight much faster than 3500 = 1 lb allows.

2006-10-23 15:32:13 · answer #3 · answered by nikkiluvsfun@sbcglobal.net 1 · 1 1

A pound of human fat requires the human to burn 3,500 calories but that has nothing to do with how calorie dense foods are.

I'd bet most candies have more than 3,500 calories in a pound... or that a pound of sugar has more than 3,500 calories....

2006-10-23 15:23:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

youre probably meaning the kilo-calorie right.. because most foods would definitely have 3,500 "calories".
well.. fats contain a energy density of 9 kcal/g
1 pound is approx. 500 g so 9 * 500 = 4500 kcal - so maybe?
if it was all fat...

food component energy density in kcal/g
fat 9
ethanol (alcohol) 7
proteins 4
carbohydrates 4
organic acids 3
Sugar alcohols (sweeteners) 2.4

hope it helps

2006-10-23 15:29:21 · answer #5 · answered by xX Henry 2 · 1 0

It is surely possible for a food to contain more than 3500 calories...

Now its also impossible for your body to retain a pound of fat if you BURN 3500 UNUSED calories..

Food doesnt equal Fat in equal terms...your body doesnt equate 3500 calories to 1 lb of fat. It equates a lil here and there, whatever your body didnt burn off and is left behind.

2006-10-23 15:31:00 · answer #6 · answered by questionaire 2 · 1 0

Absolutely a pound of food can have more than 3500 calories. Body fat needing 3500 calories worth of expenditure to drop a pound, isn't related to the number of calories per pound of food. A high cocoa butter and extra sweet pound of chocolate will deposit more than one pound of fat in your body, then it would take 3500 calories of fat burning exercise to burn one pound of that.

2006-10-23 15:30:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

energy is a substantial situation while it consists of weightloss. we could renowned 3 definitions: the quantity of energy in our meals, the quantity of energy a undeniable interest makes use of up each and each hour, and finally our very own very own on a daily basis allowance of energy. i got here across the responses to all of those queries by gaining knowledge of from the positioning in the container under, they have quite some guidance, I worked off 8 kilos by following their concepts.

2016-10-16 08:06:18 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

no , even a pound of the worst food you can get, which is fast food, doesnt even have 2500 calories.

2006-10-23 15:28:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

yes

2006-10-23 15:21:55 · answer #10 · answered by Kristenite’s Back! 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers