2006-10-23 10:06:18 · 26 answers · asked by a sock 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Neither. The athiests have more morals than Christians and Muslims combined.
2006-10-23 10:08:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
why do you have to be a christian or a muslim to have moral standards?
I believe in the seperation of church and state, so I believe that statesmanship and common sense by the leaders of the world will win the day.
Of course if the situation warrants it, military muscle can and should be introduced into the dialoge. there comes a point when enough is enough.
Death to all cavemen (except the ones on the Gieco commercials, they seem like nice guys).
2006-10-23 17:11:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didn't know there was such a fight. Both Christians and Muslims are very "moral" as far as proper living goes. It's just the way they die that's different.
2006-10-23 17:15:27 · answer #3 · answered by John 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Christians gave up on the idea of promoting their beliefs by force a couple centuries ago. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are not about promoting the christian religion, they are about the security of the united states and it's allies.
Moslems persist in the spreading of their religion by force. "Convert or die, Infidel!" , they scream as they attack the non-believer, (or the differently believing moslem in the local opposing sect.) It doesn't fit my view of morality to promote ones religion in such a fashion. It's religious fascism, and I think That when they do meet Allah, they may be very unhappy with the welcome they recieve. I don't think He'd condone their methods either.
2006-10-23 17:16:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither. Religion promotes moral laziness by spoon-feed arbitrary moralities. Atheists actually think more about why something is good or bad. All that religious people seem to manage is a lame default answer of "God said so".
2006-10-23 17:11:42 · answer #5 · answered by nondescript 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Christians, if the christians are true.
Christianity requres a christian to see the savior in people who suffer. Christianity makes no excuse for murderers. It says "thou shalt not kill". If you do, you answer to God if not men.
Islam requires spreading religion to others, first by word, then by action, then by sword. Also, look into the justification for killing in Islam...there are conditions that make it okay, and the final judgement is man, not Gods.
Finally, Christ was Celibate...he loved only the church. "MOHAMMUD" married a 9-year old girl.
Lessee, abstaining from sex or becoming a sex offender? Which is better morality? Is it better to not have sex at all or to sleep with minors?
Celibacy FTW.
2006-10-23 17:11:16 · answer #6 · answered by Rabid 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Perhaps it would be best if neither of them did. It certainly would end a lot of the violence and conflict world wide.
Both should focus only on themselves and their own actions and stop trying to dictate how everyone else should live.
Notice how Atheists never murder, mame and kill in an attempt to get people to believe as they do?
2006-10-23 17:09:15 · answer #7 · answered by misskate12001 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Neither. Because neither side practices the morality that their religion teaches. I think the trophy should go to the Buddhist
2006-10-23 17:09:05 · answer #8 · answered by smellyfoot ™ 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No one. There is no winner when fighting over morality. Fighting morality is an oxymoron.
2006-10-23 17:08:18 · answer #9 · answered by nottashygirl 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I was unaware that a fight for morality was going on. I would think that morality could take care of itself.
2006-10-23 17:08:56 · answer #10 · answered by Cybeq 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋