English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

lesson learned: so other small nations should get them too, if they dont want you to attack

2006-10-23 08:14:45 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

13 answers

You hit the nail on the head!! Same with N. Korea!!

2006-10-23 08:16:55 · answer #1 · answered by alfonso 5 · 2 3

Are you an Ameican???

Must not be. Because you so much as call Amercai a coward, by implying that if anyone has Nukes we would not attack??

Please... LOL You must have forgotten we have Nukes as well... many.. and frankly there is much better Warfare than Nukes... ever heard of Bio/Chem ???
Much more effective and leave areas less damaged for use later.

We have stuff that makes Anthrax look like baking soda!
It would be a foolish day for any countrty anywhere in the world to deliberately push the US into a war with them.

You see ignorant people think WAR is the only way to solve the issues...

WE would not go to war with another countrty no matter what without provocation or UN backing.

Far as Nukes.. Iran does not have them or not enough to do much with as of yet.

N Korea will b kept in line by China right now...

You see,.. China Says to Kim.. we cant protect you or support you.. and to now China has been about theonly support they get... So Kim says oooooo we are soo sorry we did this...

Hes lying but not stupid..

You see China and IS do not see eye to eye on many things.... BUT they are certainly NOT in any position to be without the US financial contributions or trrade... sooooo

I think N korea will eventually push too far and there will be war.. but not for a while

Iran is next

Oh,, and the US did not blow the load on Iraq... there will ALWAYS be money for WAR...

Its our soldiers who suffer and thier families.

visit www.anysoldier.com

Sponsor sombody and do something to help

Wismom

2006-10-23 17:17:27 · answer #2 · answered by Wismom 4 · 0 0

I dont think that is the nuclear missles that stop them, it is probably because the military is spread fairly thin right now, N. Korea is already backing down slightly because of the scantions being placed against them. Everyone wants America to be the world's police then criticizes them for interfering with international conflicts. Right now we have to really be strong in iraq, remember back in 2003 when the whole world was mad at iraq and everyone expected the US to do something about it, now we are doing something and ask most soldiers, we are having an impact in iraq. Everyone wants us to clean up other peoples mess. N. Korea and Iran is only a treat because of terrorist camps and/or/thru terrorist cells via trade or smuggling. Does that threaten American security, yes, but if we sure up our borders and make stringent guidelines for entry into the US then america not have to deal with as much militarily. As Iran and n. korea are considered, even their best missles cant even hit the mainland america. Some get close to hawaii and some can get to the islands of alaska (n. korea) but for the most part, we have very little business or interest in the middle east other than oil and sand. Once we develop our own fuel from corn or sugar cane (ethanol) to mass produce to replace the need on crude oil you will see the US enter the same international policy that we saw before WWI, an isolationist country because we have no significant need outside our country.
Also, remember pearl harbor, if some idiotic country even strikes american soil, you will have lines out the doors of recruiting stations to get even, its the american way. We fight for what we believe in.

2006-10-23 15:29:39 · answer #3 · answered by ANSAG 2 · 1 0

America is getting tired of the BS. We are just going to let Iran and North Korea go until they nuke the hell out of some of these nations that HATE us now and teach the nasty little twerps a lesson.

2006-10-23 15:56:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

One, Iran doesn't have nukes yet. Two, the U.S. military has been stretched almost to the breaking point, we literally do not have the manpower for another major conflict. Conscription is also not an option, we couldn't get the fresh troops trained in time to be of use now, which is when we need them.

2006-10-24 00:00:43 · answer #5 · answered by rich k 6 · 0 0

It is because we blew our load in Iraq. We are too tied down there to make any attempt at threatening another country. Diplomatically The United Nations and NATO are too fractured and week to do anything as well. Welcome to the new century where nuclear explosions by Tterrorist are a very real reality. Just wait for our response when that happens. Most of the middle east will be nothing but a wasteland and 100,000 years from now our ancestors will be mining Oil made from their fossils.

2006-10-23 15:29:03 · answer #6 · answered by Ask Me 2 · 0 1

America is doing what the world wants.. Ever heard of the UN ??? What has your country done lately.. Notta , as usual.... Oh, and by the way ... They don't have nukes try researching a little before stating your assumptions as fact.... But what does anyone expect..

2006-10-23 15:22:39 · answer #7 · answered by bereal1 6 · 1 0

NO, because the UN is playing P*SSY again. After Iran blows up half the world, then the UN will think about sanctions. Nuke the UN.

2006-10-23 15:18:11 · answer #8 · answered by Spirit Walker 5 · 1 2

Well some Americans know that the real criminals who set up 9/11 are still alive and well. I would rather go after them.

2006-10-23 15:35:27 · answer #9 · answered by Jared H 3 · 0 1

If you think that they have them already then they are willfully lying to the UN.

thats grounds for WAR by your opinion

2006-10-23 15:39:36 · answer #10 · answered by smitty031 5 · 0 0

They dont have nukes numbnutts

2006-10-23 15:35:37 · answer #11 · answered by I Hate Liberals 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers