English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

37 answers

Lust without love its exciting ,naughty and fun !! Love it

2006-10-23 02:15:34 · answer #1 · answered by dizzymooo 4 · 0 0

In a long relationship you get both as it goes through stages. First you get the lust without love - then the love and lust - later it is often love without lust - its a natural progression through life. There are no betters with any of them - its what suits at the time :-)

2006-10-23 02:09:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Love without lust. I've been in both situations and married the one I loved not the one I lusted. I'm just friends with the lusted one. (not with benefits). The one I love we have a lot in common and have a good life. The one I lusted with it was hard to go places and be normal cause all we wanted was sex.

2006-10-23 02:07:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If both people feel the same way then I'm guessing lust without love is fine for a while. Love without lust would lead to heartbreak though- there's no doubt about that. Either situation is not ideal and I'd be sceptical about their success. However, life isn't ideal either, so trying to find a match-up with someone else who thinks you're the sexiest thing on earth but has no interest in dating you, isn't necessarily a bad thing...

2006-10-23 02:10:29 · answer #4 · answered by Manicbrit 3 · 0 0

Could all the female participants hereupon who opted for Lust Without Love mind dropping me an email to elaborate on their answers? I am at work, doing a very boring editing job, and need cheering up. Lust Without Love will do that, every time.

2006-10-23 02:16:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

definately love without lust - to have a true and deep love is the best feeling in the world - much better than lust and it makes you feel fulfilled all of the time not just a temporary fix.

2006-10-23 02:07:36 · answer #6 · answered by Cailin 1 · 0 0

Love without lust is the best. because lust is doing something in a wrog way while love is the ultimate of life. without love there is no lust

2006-10-23 03:11:56 · answer #7 · answered by matareth 1 · 0 0

Lust. A hundred times better. Go with lust.

2006-10-23 02:07:31 · answer #8 · answered by josecarlosolivera 2 · 0 0

Definatly lust without love - that way neither of the ppl get hurt! Also with love without lust you'd get too attached and just be plain unhappy!

2006-10-23 02:09:07 · answer #9 · answered by ♥ Jodi ♥ Kaydi's Mummy ♥ 4 · 0 0

Interesting question!!!

But they are both very different and it all depends how you feel and what you want.
Lust without love is very fun, exciting, but remember it will go away one day. it never lasts forever.

Love without lust, is a bit boring, but at the end of the day you have someone to be open with and share your thoughts and dreams with. someone you can rely on, trust and confide in.

They are both lovely feelings, which is why i don't believe in LOVE at first sight, i say it's LUST at first sight. So if you fall in love with someone you get both!!!

2006-10-23 02:14:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers