If the ark has disentegrated or is buried under 5000 ft or more of erosion, what are the vague photos that are reported of it in the media? Many of us have seen the fuzzy pics of what "might" be the ark.
And no need for name calling, you know who you are.
2006-10-22 19:42:10 · 9 answers · asked by Cookie 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Fuzzy photos is right. Do you think that if anybody had a credible lead on anything like that there would not be swarms of archaeologists there tearing that mountain apart.
The weather would make no difference at all. we do year around research in both the Arctic and Antarctic. We climb Mount Everest for fun. We drill deep and excavate under the Greenland Icecap. What else needs to be said.
2006-10-22 19:55:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most of the pictures you have seen were taken about 50 years ago, and several expeditions were made, and some wood was recovered etc. Since then the weather has basically been prohibitive and the snow accumulation has been too thick to allow for much more trips to be made. On top of that the
Turkish Govt has not been at all cooperative. Also the Ark is in a glacier which has been moving down the mountain. Most believe that by now the whole thing has broken up and has moved down the mountain. The photos and most of the documentation was in a book written in the 1970s called "Noah's Ark, I Touched It"
2006-10-23 02:55:18 · answer #2 · answered by oldguy63 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The photos I have seen always deal with backgrounds of ice and snow. How are you going to get a photo of anything buried 5,000 feet deep?
We are now living in days similar to those of Noah. Knowing what that means is more important than finding the ark. I have talked to one man who has been up that mountain looking for the ark. There is plenty of info and photos on the net. Start with Noahsark.com (Not the guy I speak of) and go from there.
It most likely will forever remain a UFO - Unidentified Floating Object.
2006-10-23 03:06:39 · answer #3 · answered by Tommy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ok it's official,the speculative hoax that wont die. I've heard all this before,and then you get a few fuzzy photos that could literally be anything,but then again since fuzzy photos would be more proof than anything else in the Bible has I guess it's ok. So much has been proven wrong in the Bible,amazing how many basic scientific facts God got wrong,so finding the Ark would at least help his credibility a bit.
2006-10-23 03:33:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Those photos were taken through the ice layer thats covering the Ark. Can hardly get clear picture that way..
I don't Know if anybodys been able to get close enough for long due to the weather for anything better . even from space.
2006-10-23 02:48:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you really think that there might be the remnants of "THE" ark? Research this on the 'net, it was just a hoax, really it was an April Fool's Joke that got way out of hand. Some Creationist fools got sucked right in.
No, ummm disrespect.. or anything intended.. I thought that most people knew.
2006-10-23 02:49:14 · answer #6 · answered by eantaelor 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't need the Ark proved to me
I know God exists
you can try with people but you can not browbeat them
God Bless you and yours
2006-10-23 02:47:03 · answer #7 · answered by snuggels102 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fiction.
2006-10-23 03:27:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it could be the ark.
2006-10-23 02:46:05 · answer #9 · answered by p2of9 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋