Click here for further information:http://www.av1611.org/voice1.html
They should learn not to twist God's word.God bless.
2006-10-22 18:34:15 · 16 answers · asked by John G 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Many scholars are being mis lead by the leaders of the seminaries, they haven't taken time to read and study and find out that in the newer versions verses are omitted, changed etc.
2006-10-22 18:47:13 · answer #1 · answered by judy_derr38565 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Have you done any research on the King James Version of the Bible? It seems that you would have no appreciation for what you learned because you grant no value to those that understand that version differently than you... But, do you grant value to Professionals in the field of history, literature, and eytemology? The King James Bible was put together, edited, from other EARLIER manuscripts. It is obvious to all scholars in this well known and respected fields that what is most reliable when it comes to texts and literature, is the original manuscripts. By looking at these manuscripts, one can deduce that the Editor of the King James Bible took quit a few liberties of his own.
2006-10-22 18:39:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The "errors" you cite on your letter with reference to the unique King James version have been typographical no longer having any element to do with content textile.The printing press became new then and particular typesetters did misspell words. This became as a result corrected. get your data right now... The Apocrypha books weren't seen to be divinely stimulated so have been on no account risk-free. i've got study them and that i agree. Christians who've quite researched "different variations" can not help yet come to the top that the King James version is the main real and stable version.Now there's a"new kjv bible NKJV out" it quite is a wolf in sheep's clothing, i do no longer have faith it. I persist with the 1611 Kjv.i might inspire anybody to individually study diverse bibles to confirm for themselves why we could be very discerning on which version we choose for.once you notice the adjustments you would be as taken aback as i became. the internet has many sturdy websites that may assist you on your journey. could your eyes be opened too;
2016-10-16 07:08:41 · answer #3 · answered by rybicki 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That article is nothing more then a load of horse poop.
The New American Standard is the most literal, word for word translation in existence.
Besides the KJV was written in a language that was never even commonly used, but was used pretty much on stage be Shakespearean actors only.
2006-10-22 22:00:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Now you are becoming familiar with the difference in intellect and faith. The intellect is not sufficient to understand the deeper things of God.. yet they set themselves up as experts but, lack faith.. Perhaps would explain why it is written.... "The wise man has little to say but the one talking the loudest is the hypocrite." That is pretty well paraphrased. The message remains the same.
2006-10-22 18:41:07 · answer #5 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
KJ is just a translation from unauthentic source. The translation of the authentic holy Quran into any language is not considered Quran but just a translation because there may be misinterpretations and disfiguring of the original Godly unique style. You should be able to read the original authentic Bible to know the truth but unfortunately it was lost and not available any more so you have many contradictory versions.
2006-10-22 18:48:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I know the Ankerberg family. Would you like me to ask John about this event? You are really getting weird with this KJV thing. Are you in a cult?
Email me if you want to discuss this. I have earned a BA in Biblical Studies.
2006-10-22 18:41:01 · answer #7 · answered by BABY 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
And for the rebuttal, click here:
http://www.ankerberg.com/ankerberg-articles/wilkins.html
I think the Word of God is miraculous enough that it doesn't need lies. And I think we would all do better to live by it than spend our time quibbling over whether the word should be translated "Master" or "Teacher" (either way, we're supposed to learn!)
2006-10-22 18:42:29 · answer #8 · answered by world_gypsy 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
What about the other 200 versions of the Bible...do you disregard those?
2006-10-22 18:35:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I've said many things about God not existing. No invisible beings have made me mute. Sorry, but attributing bad things that happen to people to a invisible sky being is quite childish.
2006-10-22 18:36:59 · answer #10 · answered by nondescript 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋