Would UN (International Peacekeeping) Troops
Be Deployed Onto US Soil To Maintain Order
In The Event Of A Domestic Uprising
Due To The Public Unrest
Surrounding The Issue Of ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION ?
IF UN (International Peacekeeping) Troops
Were Deployed Onto US Soil
To Maintain Order
In The Event Of A Domestic Uprising
Due To The Public Unrest
Surrounding The Issue Of ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION
Would YOU As An American Citizen
SUBMIT To The Rule Of Martial Law And The Oppression
Of The UN (International Peacekeeping) Troops
Or
Would You Take Up Arms And FIGHT The UN International Peacekeeping Troops
The US Government
Cannot Deploy Troops Against American Citizens
The Government Is OUR Government
The Military Is OUR Military
2006-10-22 14:37:27 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
In The (Very Possible) Situation
Described Above
The USA
Would Be OBLIGATED To Herself
To Deploy Troops
Against
The ILLEGAL ALIENS
And Their Sympathizers
2006-10-22 14:53:27 · update #1
So Far
All The Answers Are AVOIDING The Question
WHERE DO YOU STAND ??
2006-10-22 14:55:01 · update #2
One Hour And 5 Answers Later ....
Look At The World We Live In Folks ...
Are We Excluded
From The Reach Of International Law ?
Are We Doomed To Oppression ?
Will You Fight
For Your Grandchilds America ?
Like Your Grandpa Did For YOU ?
2006-10-22 15:40:21 · update #3
Stop Denying It
Prepare For It
2006-10-22 15:42:32 · update #4
Will Hugo Chavez
Assemble Latin America Against The USA
Closely Allied
With A Variety Of Middle Eastern Influences
How Long Could That Take ?
With 20 Million (Guerilla Fighters)
Latin American ILLEGAL ALIENS
Already In Place
It Would Be Up To The CITIZENS To Defend Their Homeland
Where Is Your Loyalty ?
Which Flag Do YOU Pledge Your Allegience ?
2006-10-22 15:53:45 · update #5
It's Coming .....
American Citizens Have A Choice To Make
I Hope We Make The Right Choices
2006-10-22 15:57:18 · update #6
.. that could get real ugly ... thats where i draw the line and am willing to die ... if theres ever any foreign troops in the US i'll be one of the terrorists snipers on the news youre hearing about ..
2006-10-22 14:49:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Interesting question, I'm not sure what I would do. I would not look at UN peace keeper troopers as if they were from a foreign nation, or as terrorist attackers.
I do tend to think, if a uprising did take place, by the time they could land troopers on us soil there would not be much of anything for them to stop. I imagine 280 million Americans vs. 20 million illegals would not be much of a match, the government would be ready to let the will of the people shape the law, and corporations would be following the laws, if not out of a moral obligation but out of fear.
2006-10-22 17:33:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Like someone else said here, I hope this never happens, but your questions are very thought provoking, to be sure. I have to think about this. I don't want to give my country up to invaders, I do know that, for sure. It's hard to imagine because, in my lifetime, we have never had a war on our own soil, unless you consider the 9/11 attack. I do know that I want the illegal immigrants OUT of the USA and their continued presence and the escalating numbers coming in daily is like them thumbing their noses at us. They seem to know our government will go further to protect THEM, than it will go to protect its own citizens! I keep thinking of the recent case of our two border guards who have been convicted for shooting a known drug runner from Mexico in the butt! This absolutely astounded me! What kind of a message was that sending to the illegals AND to the rest of the protectors of our borders?
2006-10-22 19:58:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would Obey the peacekeeping troups, the UN is pretty powerful, and I am not very violent.
2006-10-22 17:13:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
You've been watching "Red Dawn" again haven't you?
The US can and has deployed US troops against it's own people.
George Washington was the first president to do so.
2006-10-22 14:43:16 · answer #5 · answered by October 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
that would be messed up, but if it happened i wouldn't be surprised they haven't been listening to the will of the people on this issue so far, so i could see them doing that to us ,and i would be against it !
2006-10-22 15:33:24 · answer #6 · answered by hayleylov 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
GREAT Question. I would allow them.........as I have watched all the "others" allow them.
BUT.........I always have a BUT. This issue is SO minimal and inconsequential compared to those needed for UN involvement. BUT.......nice way to incite.
2006-10-22 14:52:21 · answer #7 · answered by sqwirlsgirl 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
It would never happen but if, for the sake of discussion it did, they would be soundly routed.
2006-10-22 14:41:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I think you are a scary idividual who is obviously waiting for the big one!
2006-10-22 17:07:33 · answer #9 · answered by Carol R 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋