What in uttermost guidelines was the world situation with a china and russia with islam deities invading California?
2006-10-22 09:20:17 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
My answer is similar to the guy above, but with a different take: "Depends- nuclear, conventional, or economic?"
Nuclear? I agree: A full scale exchange has no winner, the true enemy would be war itself.
Conventional? We'd win- Technology, training, equipment, main battle tanks, command and control makes up for the difference in manpower, the US would win. The 4th largest army in the world was routed in 100 days.
Economic? China is about to take over the world markets, so i agree with his assessment.
2006-10-22 13:08:24 · answer #1 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Depends- nuclear, conventional, or economic?
Nuclear? It'd be a draw
Conventional? We'd lose- we simply don't have the manpower at 500,000 active duty troops to fight an invading army with 20,000,000 men from China.
Economic? We've lost. Look at how much raw materials the United States ships out, and almost everything in your house now says "Made in China" doesn't it? Look at how many companys have manufacturing plants in Mexico, Australia, China, Russia, Eastern Block countrys?
2006-10-22 09:30:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The Russians have not got extra ideal attack rifles then the U.S. does. The AK-40 seven is via far the s.h.i.t.i.e.s.t. rifle the international has ever seen. the only people who use it are the beginners. It additionally does not require any cleansing yet one extra reason stupid human beings think of that's the final rifle ever. shall we see U.S. has ultimate weapons ultimate coaching so lots extra guy means than Russia yet below China additionally america infantrymen are volunteers no longer compelled to serve such by way of fact the chinese language infantrymen All U.S. infantrymen are a minimum of two ft taller than the chinese language infantrymen LOL unsure how tall the Russians are U.S. Air rigidity is ultimate interior the international U.S. army is ultimate interior the international U.S. has ultimate tanks, helicopters, ultimate particular Operations Forces. So interior the tip U.S. wins. did no longer U.S. already smash the U.S. so as that they have got already overwhelmed Russia. China's never even been in a conflict. they have in basic terms been the sufferers of conflict.
2016-10-15 07:48:48 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The weapons the USA can deploy in a war zone would be more than a match for China's manpower . Modern warfare is not dependent on large units of men to take over territory and the size of their army would be neutralized. I think we could gain control of the air war in a very short time making large units of military nothing but tempting targets.
2006-10-22 10:58:21 · answer #4 · answered by spicoli 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell!
If I was us, I think that we should work on building relationships for the next couple of years with all countrys. We are now alone in the world. The only ones that support us are the ones that have military police states alerady setup againist there citizens. Go to London see if you like the feeling.Goto Israel see if you like the feeling. Come to america look up at your red lights and see camera's watching you. They will not start a war as usual it will be us and we will blame it on someone else. But do not think these countrys will not stand up againist a attack againist on of
there memebers.
2006-10-22 09:49:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hate to sound arrogant, but you obviously don't realize that the US has much more powerful weaponry. There's absolutely no need to use nukes to utterly destroy the world's largest continent should we choose to do so. Also any attack on the US that involves Long Range Weaponry will have no hope of reaching the coast. The only way any attack can succeed against this country is by being sneaky... a show of force is impossible.
No Joke
2006-10-22 09:35:54 · answer #6 · answered by Big C 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I may have a naive point of view, but I feel that America will be sucessful in an event like this. I look at the America of the past, and see that the American people have a special type of courage and determination that is only seen during the most extreme of situations. Sure you look at kids of today, the OC kids and such, and you say "Yeah, right". But I feel that if anyones freedom was really being threatened, peoples views would change. I don't know....ramblings of a mad man I guess, but that's how I feel.
2006-10-22 09:41:22 · answer #7 · answered by maulspider 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Let's see i dont know where your going with the details, but if we went to war with China and Russia we would win if, India, Nato, and our other allies support us though we couldnt win a total victory because we couldnt conquer them, but they could never invade us because of our navy. This is all assuming we dont use Nukes. I agree with spicoli. Russia is broke, CHINA DOES NOT HAVE MORE MONEY THAN US, THEY ARE MOSTLY FUNDED BY AMERICAN INVESTORS.
2006-10-22 11:18:47 · answer #8 · answered by asmith1022_2006 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If China went to war with United States?
You would be attending school and learning "Chinese as a second language".
2006-10-22 09:31:22 · answer #9 · answered by Jack 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Are you writing a screen play? The russians are broke remember? The Chinese could kick our butts in a heart beat, they have more money and more people. But, I can't imagine them ponying up with the russians and islam dieties to take over California.
Make sure denzel washington is defending california and then maybe i'll go see it.
2006-10-22 09:26:08 · answer #10 · answered by BParker 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋