Can the US revert the Iraq mess and Bush's party do better at the polls?

Question

A new poll suggests two-thirds of Americans believe the US is losing the war in Iraq, a proportion which analysts says could translate into a drubbing at the polls for Mr Bush's Republican Party in next month's mid-term elections.

Answer 1

The failed Iraq policy of George Bush is a clear example of greed and desperation to invoke panic among Americans. To destroy an enemy army is one thing, but to re-build a country that does not have the desire to become democratic is another, and as in Vietnam, the people have lost support of the US, and have more and more become hostile to its presence. Not one drop of oil was worth a soldiers life, we have no oil and over 3,000 killed in a war that serves absolutely no purpose at all. To win, is to take care of the Kurds in the north and establish a "Free State" for them. As far as the rest of Iraq, as with the former Yugoslavia, sometimes a Dictator is the best answer to thugs, criminals, and just plain militant people. This war has turned into a civil war a year ago, and no one could see it, it was a plan devised by Al Queda, a plan that now has gone full scale. The Iraqi police and military are worthless, they can not prevent an Iraqi city to fall into militant hands, and this only shows the pain and agony our men and women are going through. To win in Iraq is to establish a Kurdish Free State, protect the Kurds, and take our losses in the rest of the country.

Don't worry, the democrats will take the senate, and unless Mr. Bush has a trick up his sleeve, the republican party will suffer greatly over his failed strategy of Iraq.

Answer 2

The problem here is that George Bush has a stupid attitude that only HE knows anything at all and the rest of the American people are stupid idiots who count for nothing. He has a sneering smirk on his face every time he talks to reporters about Iraq or gives a speech on the subject. Now he says he will NOT change stategy in iraq, as if to say that even though the policy he has been using has resulted in more violence over the past three years by doing more of the same somehow the violence will decrease. Bush is an ego-centric psychopath who is doing more damage than anything and needs to be removed from office.

As to the US election, EVERY single incumbent running for re-election should be kicked out of office. These people think once they are elected they can spit on the American people and pursue their own stupid agendas regardless of the results.

Bush is a disaster for America. He is clearly off his rocker when he says "God told me to do it." He is so fixated on Iraq that he has lost touch with everything else, and the country is going to hell in a handbasket. The other party always thinks it can do better by doing the same things, and when it gets its butts handed to itself in handbaskets as well then they blame somebody else. None of them has any clue, and you cannot revert Iraq back. No one in the Administration has the foggiest clue about the Iraqi culture, society, or religious factions when Bush went storming into Iraq. They had no idea at all, NONE; they think they can ram the US system of government down anyone's throat, and even though it does not work they STILL think they can do it. This is all so pathetic. US Middle East policy is a shambles and is causing nothing but problems, and these idiots and stuipid fools in Washington can't even begin to see it.

Answer 3

matt2fit and A E N have said it all, even with a bit of humor. I will only add three things. Democrats will get majoriety back in either House or Senate or both. Hillary doesn't know crap about military, so Iraq war will go further south for our sons and daughters under her command, and a pull out of Iraq, will cause this money making golden goose ("War is a racket" - General Butler) to put a real strain on the jobs it created. There are several things we still make in this country: bombs and bullets, battle ships, tanks and airplanes, uniforms and paperwork.....I think?? We didn't outsource that out to China, India, Korea, Pakistan, Mexico or Thailand too, did we? Oh no....

Bottom line: get ready for some hard times and a cruel government "not" of the people; "not" for the people and certainly "not" We the People. Bush did Hillary's dirty work for her, and her husband has blackmailed our leadership into a moral bankruptcy. Get out the harps and violins; it will be one of the few full paying jobs not outsourced.......yet. Welcome to Babylon.

Answer 4

you say 'presently after'. ask your self what it replaced into like before the invasion began. besides that.... why might want to we wrestle for yet another international locations liberation? To my way of questioning, a united states might want to be requested in the journey that they prefer liberation first & the certainly invaders who're there to promote liberty might want to opt to unencumber that united states. If our personal international locations leaders were difficulty-free in the naming of the invasion, it would want to were "operation take down hussein". the actuality is in the planning, my expensive. you want to make the effort to flick via some old newspaper's from 2001 - 2003.... This invasion replaced into unplanned..... at the same time as it replaced into time to abort the challenge, because "we had received", we couldn't go away the mess that were created. The mess replaced into created because the country were left and not using a pacesetter. no one to blame of an finished united states... Looting, Gang -Forming, mass overlook - i'm no longer declaring that Hussein did a astonishing job.... yet, a minimum of, the country replaced into policed. The U.S. might want to correctly be a impressive-means.... yet we shouldn't get that wondered with great-hero. The Invasion lacked the plan: 'what to do for administration after the present administration is taken down'.

Answer 5

The Republicans are not making any changes before the election. Some Democrats are demanding changes before the election, even if it might help the Republicans. Not that the changes would have much time to work.

Answer 6

So what,,why bother?Let the Democrats have this mess they started with Clinton & lets sit back & see what a wonderful job they can do that George isn't doing now..k?I for one will be waiting in the wings to see this great Democrat leadership take the reigns!

Answer 7

I really hate the idea that someone would really vote straight party lines. I perfer the concept of voting for the best candidate, regardless of party. Both parties have demons to deal with!