According to a study by Johns Hopkins University and Iraq’s Al-Mustansiriyah University researchers Which was published in The Lancet medical journal two weeks ago that the war in Iraq has caused between 420,000 and 790,000 Iraqi deaths & more than 2800 American military deaths.
It’s a staggering number.
This report is more evidence of the daily tragedy in Iraq. Each life lost carries with it lost hopes, loves, and dreams. Each life lost is another reason that the war in Iraq must end.
Till now, Bush & his administration , wanting to keep a positive spin on Iraq news coverage,
but whether 40,000, 100,000 or 500,000 people have died in Iraq, this war has cost too many human lives. The only resposibility for these lost innocent human lives are belong to Bush & his administration. I am asking all the honest people around the globe to give equitable answer by one word YES if they agree or NO if they disagree about that.
2006-10-21 18:11:11 · 25 answers · asked by Muzaffer E 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
yes
2006-10-21 18:13:24 · answer #1 · answered by nikki 2 · 1⤊ 5⤋
this question isn't so basic because it incredibly is boiled all the way down to a definite or no answer. Iraq is a rustic crammed with turmoil and hatred. Its very own electorate are turning against one yet another by way of fact of diverse religious factions. Muslims from different worldwide places are entering there and inflicting terrorist action to ward off democratic progression. it incredibly is a hornet's nest of activity. human beings forget that even earlier the conflict began mass genocide exchange into happening below the regime of Saddam Hussein. Tragedy, oppression and dying are no longer new issues to Iraq and did no longer commence with President Bush or the yank human beings.
2016-10-15 07:10:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that we all are responsible by not doing something sooner. And I don't just mean by going to war either. There are many ways to help man kind and yes going to war is one of them. And yes people die in wars. But if some thing hadn't of been done in the WW1 and WW2, we would all be speaking Japanese or German right now. Would you rather us wait until they move in to other parts of the worlds and try to take it over and let them make the first strike against us? Oh wait a minute, they did on 911 and before that. So I guess you want to learn and teach you r kids how to speak Pakistani or what ever they speak over there.
2006-10-21 18:28:01 · answer #3 · answered by poobear 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
First off it was found that fewer than 200,000 Iraqi's have been killed. And for 2800 Americans dead, very tragic but very miraculously low for a war of this magnitutde and length. As for the anti-war group, it has ALWAYS cost more civilian lives during war than military lives. In WW2 it was a 15 to ratio...in this war it is a 3 to 1 ratio. Do the math, this is the least costliest war America has ever fought in of this magnitude concerning loss of life.
2006-10-21 18:21:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
You've answered your question, in your question. Your "facts" are a totally unscientific study of Iraq, and our involvement there.
Take a look at the analysis of this report on NRO. That's National Review Online, and subscribe, if you like the report.
Anyway, this dumbass is spouting bogus figures, and everyone knows that. He's been de-bunked! Our casualties are very low, and we've killed very few Iraqi's.
The insurgency has killed more Americans and Iraqis, than any American action.
2006-10-21 18:26:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
An issue this complex and you want a one word response? Funny, Bush supporters are always accused of seeing things "black and white" and this guy wants a "yes" or a "no."
First of all that study is terribly suspect. Secondly, the American military takes great pains to avoid civilian casualties. Third, had you studied previous wars, you would know that, for example, one battle in WWII might cost 20,000 lives and more casualties.
The US military has lost nearly 3,000 brave souls in the last 3.5 years. OBVIOUSLY every life lost is a huge loss for the US and her allies, but compared to other wars, this is a (fortunately) small amount.
If you seek someone to blame, blame Saddam Hussein who was the cause of the invasion, and Iran for currently supporting the chaos in Iraq.
2006-10-21 18:17:13 · answer #6 · answered by C = JD 5 · 8⤊ 2⤋
Sorry no,
Sole responsibility goes to the Terrorists and their Leaders
especially the mass murderers/coward Bin Laden and his
lieutenant the Egyptian Doctor hiding in Pakistan.
Judgement day is coming for you Bin Laden tick-tock U.S. and British Special Forces will get you it's just a matter of time.
2006-10-21 18:44:42 · answer #7 · answered by markm 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i think someone had to step in and stop what Saddam and his people were doing , but i also think it should have been done the right way and not because of the attack on 9-11 , its like were trying to fight 10 wars at once , there's Afghan with bin laden , then there's Iraq with Saddam and now its Korea , i think its gonna get way out of hand and we will be looking at world war 3.
2006-10-22 06:29:08 · answer #8 · answered by pammeh_2k6 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
NO, NO, NO, and, finally, NO.
To blame "Bush and his administration" for these tragedies is absolutely ignorant!
Try placing just a small part of the responsibility on the Islamic, nut ball terrorists who flew the planes into the World Trade Centers!
2006-10-21 18:36:42 · answer #9 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes
2006-10-21 18:14:04 · answer #10 · answered by whrldpz 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
it is a success for the Jews who have succeeded in the avowed policy of killing Muslims with the help of American crusaders.
2006-10-21 19:53:30 · answer #11 · answered by Shaheen 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋