It depends... many women look for different "types" of men in different stages of their life. In their youth, they may look for more "hunky" possibly even "bad boy" types. But as they get older and want to settle down, they look for someone to "settle down" with... and that person should be smart and kind, and yes, a good provider (or at least not dependant on the woman).
I believe this comes from "cave man" days. In hunter-gatherer times, the men with best genes would be the best providers. They could get more food, and would be better at physically protecting their family. Women would gravitate towards these men, because they knew their children would be strong like the father, and also have the best chance to thrive. I believe that this is still somewhat in a woman's base instincts, which makes her more physically attracted to these types of strong, attractive men. However, nowadays the "good provider" is defined as someone else - usually a white-collar type of guy. So women are drawn in different directions. Men, however, have the instinct to simply spread their genes to as many women as possible, so they aren't necessarily looking for specific qualities (at least on a basic physical level.)
2006-10-21 17:08:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Heidi 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Which additionally begs the question, why is it that i don't get inspired by way of penetration...that hurts. So then of course i'm no longer meant to be penetrated! God curiously created us, top? Then we are in his image and all that crap, yet then why can we try this? And the belief what women folk can penetrate the guy together with her hands and all that's merely stupid. valuable it extremely is one thank you to have relaxing, yet why placed it THERE?? via fact it extremely is supposedly a sin to be gay, then why provide us those suggestion on a thank you to have relaxing being gay? Why no longer basically take it away? it could be common adequate for him considering he's seemingly all efficient.
2016-11-24 22:06:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by jarvie 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You sound pretty dead on. Most women have a "type." I, for example, don't like overly muscular men and have a thing for dudes with sexy hands and glasses. I think women are more dynamic in what they find attractive in a man. There's no surefire "formula" for what will turn a woman's head. I also LOVE men who show some sort of fatherly instinct (look out for their little brother/sister and like babies...so caveman of me!)
2006-10-21 17:04:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by lauren 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I really dont become attracted to someone without speaking with them- but if its anything visual at all its definitely a man in an expensive suit and polished shoes. I really dont get turned on by a man who does manual labor. And yes that sounds snotty - but at least I'm truthful!
2006-10-21 17:13:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by AGNY 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have to say "Scent" is very stimulating to us females. You have to smell good in order to catch our eye. Sometimes it can be just your smile or the way you carry yourself. For me I love men who smell good, dress decent (not over the top) and seem to have a good head on there shoulders. Also a man with goals turns me on.
2006-10-21 17:09:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Careatha 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
A nicely dresssed credit card, a big fat check,
the smell of leather as in a wallet! :P They find a doctor/lawyer + other with $ erotic...
2006-10-21 17:07:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Money, all the Ladies Only Pls answers are lying, unless they say money.
2006-10-21 17:01:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
eye contact...dark hair..just throwing clothes on and looking great not matching every gd thing in the freaking world..and biceps..a nice smile...
2006-10-21 17:06:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by dreamy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
touch..like ...if they touch your finger by accident and .. are very hot...!!
2006-10-21 18:31:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by sam 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hard one... I guess just if there's someone cute?????????????????????????????????????
2006-10-21 17:01:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋