i say it sucks bcos many ppl think its the best grappling submission technique ever.bjj is something that u can use only in the tournament..competition ect..but in street fight it is useless...
ure putting an opponent a bjj lock while his friend stomping at you....
however i dunno if bjj teach striking tech bcos the whole country i living in didnt even know what is bjj...
2006-10-21 07:18:01 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Martial Arts
i agree with you....i know a lot of people that have taken it and still dont know how to fight.
2006-10-21 07:51:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bjj Sucks
2016-10-16 00:35:39 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's no such thing as sucking. The term sucking comes from people why try to act better than others and use the term "hey you suck" Really its not that you suck no one sucks. Its how much effort you put into mma. Remembr mma dosent cling in a 6 month period. You need to have a well developed backround of bjj and muay thai if those are your professions in mma. The quantity of how much time Is put off for mma and training varies too It dosent make sense to ask why you aren't as good as others if you go for 2x a week for 1 hour I go 4 days a week from 6 pm to 9 in both bjj and thai Learning the moves aren't as important as being here every day and doing your part. That is more important because by doing so you will remember and succede in any art
2016-03-17 10:36:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, first off, you are talking about a 2v1 situation. It's true you shouldn't be on the ground in that position, but you shouldn't even be there. Show me a clip of ANYONE winning a fight vs. two people. (real fight, I don't wanna see the krava maga/systema bs) In that situation you wanna get away as safely as possible. You right that you wanna strike. and you wanna make a short painful attack and get out of there... FAST! If those attackers are smart at all they'd try to tie you up while the other knocks you out from behind. Clinching can be VERY hard to avoid, and many of the traditional striking styles do not train well at keeping distance because they never practice having someone actually try to clinch properly with them. So in conclusion to the 2v1 senario... you run fast and get help.
BJJ does teach striking, but more often from a dominant ground position rather than standup or clinch.
I wanna see a rebuttle to the very good points from my fellow answerers. Cross train, if you think striking only will stop someone from taking you down you are DEAD WRONG. The ground is a completely different world and you need wrestling, bjj, catch styles to dominate.
2006-10-21 13:29:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
You're a complete moron. lol
I've personally not been in a fight since I started training BJJ, but a buddy of mine (a purple) was working as a bouncer and a bar patron attacked him so he simply took him down, hard, controlled him and wailed on him a few times.
It's all about control baby. If you don't want to train BJJ, you don't have to. But I feel sorry for you if you ever go up against someone who has a shred of an idea of what to do on the ground. Say goodnight.
2006-10-21 19:49:33 · answer #5 · answered by Edward 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
You're a idiot! I use to do a bit bjj and I use it in real life twice. First time all of the guy's friends run away like a pu55y. Second time I choke a man out and no one came to stomp on me.
Even if they do, I would have common sense to stand up. beside that I really doubt you will want to fight anymore if you watch your friend limb getting snap into two.
Also keep in mind even with striking art, you still have VERY slim chance of winning a fight against more than one person and that's coming from a Muay Thai fighter and boxer!
2006-10-21 11:08:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'm not sure. You probably make a good point. All martial arts styles are limited to some extent. I, personally, know very little in regards to grappling skills, but have often thought to myself that Brazilian jujitsu would be the **** if I could actually find a place around here that teaches it. I suppose, one should posses skills in all areas fighting. Tournament skills are are good for what they are, but I think a lot of people are sometimes deceiving themselves thinking that, because they excel in certain aspects of competition, that they are somehow invincable. Some techniques, although useful for winning points in tournaments and such, would probably actually get them killed in an actual kill or be killed type situation.
2006-10-21 08:05:42 · answer #7 · answered by paganvegan 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
What are you talking about? Let's say that a fight goes to the ground and someone mounts you. Thanks to BJJ, you know how to escape instead of lying there and taking a pounding from both the guy and his friend without a chance of escape. And don't say you will eye gouge or strike upwards, because he can put much more power into his strike than you and eye gouge you easier because he has the better position.
2006-10-21 12:42:03 · answer #8 · answered by MBG 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
.........dude,.....the top line bjj's will never use a lock if he's just gonna cop a stomping......... The real top line bjj's are just as happy to smash an attacker's face with heavy deadly punch's in a multiple situation as he is in snapping a joint in a 1 on 1 situation..........If yuh wunna matchup three top line bjj's in a brawl against 3 saturday night boofhead's, yuh 3 boofhead's are simply gonna end up smashed, and if they wanna few extra's thrown in, they can find out what it's like to get a joint busted as well... Your'e top line bjj fighter's are top's in cage, ring, and street fighting, but if you get them together in 2's,.3's,.4's, and 5's, etc, they're absoloutely deadly in multiple fighting as well....Anyone who cross trains combining lock's, grappling, kick's and punche's will alway's hold the ace's over somebody who merely punch's and stomp's....Top bjj's and cross trainer's are dynamite in the fisticuff's dude,. and if you dont reckon,. then i suggest you try one,. and i'll book your ambulance for you now......p.s. (grappling include's standing and on the ground,.submission's lock's etc)
2006-10-21 09:04:29 · answer #9 · answered by peanut 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I wouldn't say it sucks. It has some advantages & also disadvantages. On the ground, it is very good, But I much prefer to keep my feet under me. Ground systems are useless against multiple attackers.
2006-10-22 13:59:48 · answer #10 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Brazilian Jujitsu is an excellent ground fighting technique, but in a 2 to 1 situation, you have to remember that it's the standing game that matters until you can isolate one of your opponents to work on them individually; and if he just HAPPENS to takes you to the ground, but even then you have to move quickly to work on the one that has you on the ground before his friend recovers.
but that's why you have to do what you gotta do to survive, even if it means severely injuring one of your opponents like breaking an arm to disable one of them.
The thing you fail to realize is that in ANY Martial Art whatever happens is purely hypothetical on the the part of your opponent(s) and what they'll do in the fight, and that's a lot of WHAT IFS.
and that's why you have to train for, to be ready in any situation and whatever your opponent ends up offering you in the fight that could work to your advantage.
ANY well rounded fighter will have studied both sides of the fight the standing game AND the ground game.
AND yes Brazilian Jujitsu as well as it's Japanese counterpart DOES make use of striking techniques.
2006-10-21 15:02:13 · answer #11 · answered by quiksilver8676 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋