English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

I could have proided a better awnser but its simple. The U.S
only trusts certain countries and think all should be in its liking.
The U.S wants to keep all in line before they can rebel. For example you have 5 strangers in a basement with 2 of them being people you have known for a month. You pass out shot
guns to all of them. Would you really feel that comfortable
with cetain people and not comfortable with others. Personally
I think it is plane politics. The U.S aproves nuclea weapons to countries they think deserve them and are responsible. But
is this really the decission that America should make? When
a weak country like North Korea develops nukes the U.S will try everything to disarm them. But if China and Russia have them
it would not be a good idea.But if you look at it my way the
patriots of America say that simply bombing Iran with nukes as well as NK it will all end. It may win in a conventional fight like Jaoan when the government was noble enough to accept defeat
because they did not want people to die. But if it was inconventional and nukes were dropped always and the governmane did not care for its people imagine how the war would be like. Japanese militia spreading everwhere nobody would win. The same thing that COULD have happened with Japan will certainly happen with Iran or NK. Lets say it is 2012. Iran has nuclear bombs. Israel nukes them. Millions die. But
does that automatically mean Israel won. Not by a long shot the terrorists would spread everwhere. This is what Kim Il Sung
did in the Korean war. He dared America to drop a nuke. He wanted that so it would be a inconventional hell like Iraq.
The thing is that strgelers of a nuked Iran or NK would be better trained fund and equiped by who? RUSSIA and CHINA!
Why America has not held sanctions is because if you might not have noticed the U.N is not an international body it is a puppet of the U.S. Its located next to New York why could it not be held in
one of those small Island in the Atlantic? Do you se the International community coming up to sanction the U.S not really.
If it was a united body I think the U.S would have sanctions at this point. Israel is also a puppet of the U.S because nobody has made a move to hold sanctions. But I think that the moment Israel nukes a Middle Eastern countrysociety as we know will end. Terrorists would be everwhere...

2006-10-20 20:36:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I don't know. But I don't know how Israel can possibly use a nuclear bomb? Bomb the West Bank? or Lebanon? They better be careful in which direction the wind blows. They simply can't use a nuclear bomb. As for US sanctions. Israel only exists because of US support. It's a pity that the most developed and civilized country in the region should base its existence on militarism but that's how things are at the moment. The US won't even give Israelis visas if they want to escape the terrorism of Jews and Arabs in their country. So they are stuck, but they are tough and resourceful both nations. cousins as they are.

2006-10-20 21:26:05 · answer #2 · answered by Alex G 6 · 0 1

Israel refuses to confirm or deny the widespread belief that it has the bomb, but it is believed to have more than 100 atomic weapons. The center of Israel's weapons program is reported to be the Negev Nuclear Research Center near the desert town of Dimona. Former Prime Minister Shimon Peres, in a rare television interview, recently made a public admission that Israel began developing a 'nuclear option' in the 1950's.

The US doesn't issue sanctions because Israel is their ally.

2006-10-20 20:08:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We do not know for certain that Israel has the bomb, but if they did and the UN wishes to issue sanctions then they would have to issue sanctions on the USA, Britain, France, Russia, Pakistan, India, and all others who have the bomb. Lots of luck.

2006-10-21 00:37:01 · answer #4 · answered by wunderkind 4 · 1 0

I think that it is rather humorous that the only country in the history of our world to EVER use a nuclear bomb in combat believes itself capable of determining what countries should and should not have nuclear weapons.

Nuclear weapons, for the countries that have them, act as a deterrent. Most nations have no real intention of using them, but simply use them as a way to prevent any attacks from outside its borders. Iran, if it really is pursuing nuclear weapons, would in my opinion simply be doing so to thwart any potential Western intervention into its politics. While I am as vehemently anti-Israel as Ahmadinejad, I'm not a huge fan of the guy and anybody with any knowledge of the Middle East understands that even the Islamic Republic of Iran knows that any direct military attack against Israel would be suicidal considering the number of nuclear weapons in the Zionists' arsenal. What Ahmadinejad realizes, that American citizens don't seem to comprehend, is that the United States will not attack a country in possession of weapons of mass destruction. Does anybody really think that if Iraq had WMDs, the USA would have invaded with the risk involved in doing so? Bush and his administration are not concerned that Iran might develop nuclear weapons to attack Israel or pass the technology to Hezbollah or Harakat al-Muqawama al-Islamiyya (Hamas), they are mad that such a move prevents any possible forced regime change in Iran from outside its borders.

But to really answer the question, Israel is suspected to have around 200 nuclear weapons, though they officially neither confirm nor deny having a program. And the U.N. has attempted to hold Israel accountable on various things (unfortunately not on nuclear weapons from my research), but Israel has a tendency to ignore anything the United Nations says. Between 1967-1988, for example, there were 429 resolutions passed against Israeli actions of whatever form, basically none of which were taken seriously by the Zionist entity. Fortunately for Israel, they have a powerful friend on the Security Council with veto power. Technically, Israel is not bound to anything, because they did not sign the NNPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty), but they avoid sanctions by being an American ally and playing to European insecurity, throwing out the word "anti-Semitic" whenever possible.

2006-10-20 21:01:16 · answer #5 · answered by Luis Valencia 1 · 0 1

How many have they used so far, or even tested? They are there for the very reason Iran is now professing.. To exterminate Israel. That fact in itself would give justification for Israel to use those bombs.. Just in self protection. The same thing they have been doing for nearly 60 years now. Seems all her neighbors think it is good sport to continue to kill the Israelis. But now the chips are serious and the results are not going to be pleasant. Those bombs are the only thing preventing other surrounding countries from continuing to try and take over that territory.

2006-10-20 19:53:51 · answer #6 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 0 1

Do maximum persons recognize that Iran would not bomb Israel interior the 1st occasion, and that in the event that they're making a bomb, it is possibly greater as a deterrent to Israeli aggression than a threat? Israel and the US are the biggest threat to peace in that area, all of us understand that for a actuality via fact they're people who're the aggressor, Iran has no longer performed something to Israel, different than to make the remark that the regime occupying Jerusalem ought to vanish from the pages of time (no longer even his quote with the help of ways, it replaced into borrowed for his speech from Khomeini. it must be insulting, even though it is not a threat), no longer that Israel must be wiped from the map. This tells us some thing top there. putting words in some ones mouth to cause them to appear like the aggressor is a blatant lie, and an excuse to make the 1st aggressive step. And we've considered how Israel loves their pre-emptive strikes. None of those international places decide for to bomb Israel, they are no longer stupid, they understand the ramifications. perhaps if Israel started dealing justly with the Arabs who stay in Israel, and persons that stay outdoors of it, they'd not could desire to be hectic approximately watching their back lots.

2016-10-02 12:41:04 · answer #7 · answered by Erika 4 · 0 0

Nobody thinks that Israel will ever attack the West. Everybody worries that Iran and Hezbollah and Islamists based in Pakistan and Afghanistan would do so if they could. As for North Korea, nobody knows anything.

Then there is the issue of delivery systems.

2006-10-20 19:49:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The no. of nuclear bombs is no matter. Isreal has as many bombs as needed by the country. The fact is that USA and allo ther europeon countries have soft corner for isreal. they do know that Isreal has nuclear capability, yet they do not impose sanctions against this country. It is double standard and nothing else.

2006-10-20 22:36:49 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 0 1

Israel does not go public with weapons number strengths. but the best guess that has been floated around the past few years is 150-225.

2006-10-20 23:41:50 · answer #10 · answered by tjhand5094 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers