Ok, This is on the subject of abortion. Before I get people haten on me I want to say I believe in womens rights and I have no reason or want to take any of their rights from them. I do not believe I or anyone has the right to tell a women what to do with her body. Now, having said that I would like to point this out. There are condoms, birth control, and the morning after pill. HELL, I will even go so far as to say the morning after pill for the first month, but where is the line drawn? For example, if I found out a women was with child, and that child was mine, I would do everything within my power to prevent that women from killing my/our child. Now I am one of the most passive people on the net, and I know many will be haten on me for this question, but what about the father's rights. What would you do to save your child, if you was a father and found out the mother was going to about, where is our rights to save our childs life??????????????????????????????
2006-10-20 19:10:42 · 15 answers · asked by Doug favors universal insurance! 3 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
Just so no one mis-understands, no one is with my child now, but it did happen in the past, my child was aborted and I did not find out until a few years later. The women can not understand why I am upset but she could have talked to me first.... I just want to know if anyone feels like I do?
2006-10-20 19:16:06 · update #1
Colleen O, With respect, I do not agree with you. I realize that the women carries the child for nine months, and that the man does not go through child birth. God made it that way not me. If I had the choice, I would have done that to save my child. Also, after four weeks I think, the child has hands, arms, feet, a heart beat, and blood in his or her BODY. How can you say it is not alive/ a baby, until it is born. I am sorry but that is just plane wrong!
2006-10-20 19:20:46 · update #2
RASUNA, I would never abanden a women, exp. if she was with child, and that child was mine. Unfortanitly, I had no clue
2006-10-20 19:26:45 · update #3
I know that the women carries the child for nine months, goes through morning sickness, and bears the pain of child birth. I respect that. I am saying how could u or anyone find faught with a father who loves the child eventhough he or she has not been born yet, in trying to safe the childs life. Where is the reason here. There is birth control, condoms, and the morning after pill. I love women and am with them, I mean on their side, I think they need more rights but I think the father should have rights too. I think it is wrong for a women to abort the child without at least talking to the father first. I do not understand why some do not understand that?
2006-10-20 19:30:56 · update #4
Shark Gumbo, I agree with part of what you said. I do use condoms now, and I had no idea she had stoped the birth control. Nevertheless, I would tryed to stop her from aborting. I know it is her body, I am not trying to control her body, but I would have tryed, begged, brebed, done what ever I could to have saved the life of my child, if it was mine, we will never know. Fact is, I think that the mother should have to talk to the father first before aborting. When I asked why she did not talk to me about it, she said because she new I would try to talk her out of it. I asked why she did it, and she said the child did not fit into her plans, it was an inconvience to her and she did not want to be saddled with a child. I have no respect for the b***h. Abortion should not be a form of birth control. But your right I sould have used a condom. I am glad this was a few years ago, does not hurt as mmuch. I am glad your mother did not abort you because it was not in her scd. good answer though
2006-10-20 19:39:28 · update #5
Consider this, I could have in this case got full cust. and raised the child myself. I would have not wanted child support, I would have signed a statement for that. I think this should change. Say after the 1st month, no aboutions. How can you say the child is not alive when he or she has a heart beat??
2006-10-20 19:43:47 · update #6
This question has gone on since abortion became legal hon, you aren't the first to ask and as much crap as I'll probably get for this, I agree with you. There is nothing on record that protects your parental rights. It's sort of a double edged sword. A women can be charged with child abuse/neglect for endangering her unborn fetus by drug/alcohol abuse, but hell, she's got uncle sam standing behind her if she decides to outright kill that child before it's born. It makes no sense. My advice to you would be to just simply not put yourself in that situation until you find someone that has the same views as you do in regards to being a parent. It's about the only control a man has when it comes to this.
2006-10-20 19:17:37 · answer #1 · answered by Hollynfaith 6 · 6⤊ 1⤋
definite, you have an somewhat stable ingredient and it look which you place extremely some concept into this. I additionally think of it incredibly is bigoted that men get no say interior the infant's destiny...in spite of everything, it incredibly is his infant as much as that's the mummy's and mutually as the newborn will improve in her, i do no longer think of that provides her each and all the rights to the infant. besides the indisputable fact that, i'm uncertain of whether or no longer the daddy might desire to might desire to pay newborn help if he needs to terminate and he or she does not...i will see the two facets of the fence in this one...definite, he's as responsible by way of fact the mummy concerning theory, so he might desire to might desire to pay, yet no, in view that he needed a termination he shouldn't might desire to. i won't be able to compliment! additionally, concerning adoption...the guy does have a decision there. besides the indisputable fact that, the distinctive companies are twisted and characteristic techniques of working around the daddy if the mummy needs an adoption. she will declare she does not understand who the daddy is or she will have somebody from the employer write their call by way of fact the daddy, so as that they are able to sign away his rights. i think of it incredibly is somewhat incorrect and all companies might desire to be compelled to have the daddy's call on the delivery certificates and a paternity try as to whoever's call is on there. (Oh, and the guy CAN sign off his rights.) So, incredibly in spite of everything, the guy is particularly lots screwed. He has a threat contained whilst it comes to adoption, however the girl gets to make the choice to abort/no longer abort. i might incredibly choose to her some men's critiques in right here, too...
2016-10-15 06:19:32 · answer #2 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I totally agree with you although I'm sure your going to get many answers singing the song of a woman's body, etc, etc. My brother in law found himself in this situation a few years ago. My sister decided to get an abortion and he was absolutely devastated. (they were separated at the time and just had a short reunion) What got us all really thinking was that he had no rights in this decision at all, however if he was the one who wanted the abortion and she decided against it, he then is liable for child support?? Thankfully he was able to convince her not to go through with it and he now has sole custody(as agreed during her pregnancy) and is very happy.
2006-10-20 19:18:34 · answer #3 · answered by blahblahblah 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I agree 100% it's not just the womans baby it's his too she should speak with him first at least let him know what she's going to do it before she does it even if he doesn't want her to and to be honest I hate the fact that anyone would kill there own child and blah blah I know that hole it's not alive thing unil it's out or what ever but if it's not alive it's dead right? so it has to grow a little we all grow everday I think it's retarded pepole would kill there own child!
2006-10-20 19:31:11 · answer #4 · answered by blood_shadow_walks 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If its before the first trimester then its really technically not killing the baby. You may think so but by then its only really a few cells lage and is not even called a baby at that point. Yes a father has a right to what they want, but is it your body?, no! Yes you made her;him, but you really cant make amother change their mind. If a womena has their mind set on something, i suggest backing out of the way.
2006-10-20 19:16:36 · answer #5 · answered by aricalyn10<3 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
i heard about this one case where a father found out that the mother of his unborn baby was going to have an abortion and some how he got the courts to terminate her rights and had her locked up till the baby was born for its safety then he got full custody of the baby. true or not iam not really sure but i wished more guys would stand up and fight for thier rights in cases like these.
2006-10-20 19:17:18 · answer #6 · answered by thinkofmealwayslver 3 · 5⤊ 2⤋
I think ANY human life is to be saved; in the event of ANY question regarding it, save a person on death row,or someone dying of natural causes that cannot be saved.
Period.
2006-10-20 19:15:51 · answer #7 · answered by Buttercups 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Dude, once you've had your fun, it is inside her body.
Her body = her choice.
If you don't want to take the chance, be a man and wear a condom.
Or better still, don't have sex with a woman who would do that if it so offends you.
2006-10-20 19:28:51 · answer #8 · answered by S h ä r k G û m b ò 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
well i have to agree with you for the most part especially since im a single father riasing my daughter and id have to say that your ex sounds like a heartless gutless irresponsible *****
2006-10-20 20:15:12 · answer #9 · answered by chester 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
we have no rights. it jus like if the child was born and if she decided 2 put c-s on u, she has every right, even if u r bein a man about yours
2006-10-20 19:16:38 · answer #10 · answered by luckymc100 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋