2006-10-20 10:37:08 · 10 answers · asked by Goddess of Nuts PBUH 4 in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Parenting
I absolutley do not think so. I am so appaled at these women who just spread their legs for another payday. And WE tax payers are the ones cutting their checks. What really kills me is the people I see at the grocery store buying better food than I can even afford with food stamps.
I have raised my child pretty much single handidly from day one and I have worked full time since she was 3 mos old to make sure she had all I could give her and at least the basics. Women who just take a check from the state like we owe them something for being a mother (right)! By no means am I looking for a pat on the back for being a responsible parent but these women act as though we should give them sympathy because they won't get off their backs and get a job.
2006-10-20 11:58:09 · answer #1 · answered by Me, again 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
dont forget "environmentally" responsible...
with over 6.5 BILLION people on the planet - the United Nations has long warned that human over population will be our downfall.. they also suggested a long term figure of 5 BILLION - many scientists actually think 500 Million is more reasonable... more people = more pollution, much of which is permanent and slowing destroying our air and weather patterns...
2006-10-20 10:46:36 · answer #2 · answered by CF_ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you need to clarify your question.. ...however, from what i can gather, it is not responsible in anyway to breed beyond your means... ....for any reason... ..... ...and if you are breeding beyond your means, you are only raising poor ignorant kids because you cant support them the way they need in all ways... ...in that case...would you really want to breed under such circumstances if you are really just hurting your cause?
2006-10-20 10:44:11 · answer #3 · answered by Carmen 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it's not. I, too, am puzzled by people who have several children and are pinching every penny to subsist. I understand loving children and wanting to have more children, but it must be some kind of selfish love if you have children with out considering the quality of life you will be able to afford them.
2006-10-20 10:40:46 · answer #4 · answered by MightyMoose 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. And having kids you can't support threatens their health and sanity. It places them in perilous conditions which becomes an unending struggle. Parents need to be more responsible.
2006-10-20 10:44:07 · answer #5 · answered by Arnold M 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes
because they have what they want a large family. They may not miss items that people with less children have at home. but they have a different outlook on life and priorities
2006-10-20 10:47:45 · answer #6 · answered by Wicked 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no..in fact its quite ignorant...what makes people think they can take care of hordes when alot of them not all but alot cant even responsibly and properly take care of themselves. to think procreating beyond your financial means ,not mention other important factors,is not only foolish but dangerous to each person's sense of self.
2006-10-20 10:43:04 · answer #7 · answered by ? 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope. In reality when someone has more kids than they can afford, someone else picks up the tab somewhere. Make sure you go to work tomorrow, millions of welfare recipients are depending on you.
2006-10-20 10:43:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Didn't you just ask this question in a slightly different way? Of course you did. Please check the answers you got then.
2006-10-20 10:43:23 · answer #9 · answered by canucklehead1951 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO!!!!
2006-10-20 11:31:50 · answer #10 · answered by jimbell 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋