Gramatically the word itself is not plural; it will precede a plural noun, but the word itself is not plural. The word 'all' can not carry a tense or be possesive, so the answer to your question is no.
The word all is not plural.
2006-10-20 09:14:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by GodsGrl4Real 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
All Plural
2016-12-15 05:51:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is a good question. I think it is plural. You would say "all phones must be off."
2006-10-20 09:16:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by aim_a_tola_3 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
all is not plural it would be correct to say all phones must be shut off
2006-10-20 09:10:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
All implies plural. "All phones must be off" = "They" must be off. If you can replace a noun clause with "they", it's plural.
2006-10-20 09:12:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by quilty 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
All phones must be off. If you wanted to say one, you would say the phone must be off. All implies there is more than one.
2006-10-20 09:10:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Caitlin 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/awyQw
It's just babby, as in "They are taking the three babby back to New York too lady to rest."
2016-04-04 00:15:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
all phones must be off. all is not always associated with plural though.... all of that, all of this, all of the other, all of me, her, his, it,
2006-10-20 09:12:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Your ear must tell you that the second answer is not grammatically correct. "All" is not a noun, so it is neither singular or plural.
2006-10-20 09:11:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by theophilus 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I say 'babbies'. When I'm feeling extra silly, I just use babby the way it is for plural.
2016-03-17 05:13:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋