Or, would they stay and topple the new Iraqi government in its infancy, and set up in its place a strict Islamic State?
2006-10-19 22:09:08 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
The insurgents will take over, as they've wanted to do since we got here. And I use the word "here" quite literally. Insurgents don't hate America. They hate a force that makes it impossible for them to turn Iraq into a police state.
People voted Saddam Hussein into office because he was the only candidate. He made sure of that through his dictatorial rule and scare tactics. The man had his son-in-law executed for disagreeing with him. The people voted for him out of fear. I would hardly call that a free election.
2006-10-19 22:52:36 · answer #1 · answered by DOOM 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
second is right....then after they set up an islamic state they will train terrorist to hit us again.....we have appease to many government over there and it has finally come time to take a different tact when dealing with them, the only thing the seem to understand is violence. You need to show them strength and that you are willing to stand up to them to get them to stop;;;
2006-10-20 08:29:41 · answer #2 · answered by cyborg_2099 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A civil war is raging in Iraq and the insurgency is mostly Iraqis.
Bush will decide who "redeploys" as you put it and his fan boys will somehow blame it all on the Democrats.
2006-10-20 05:13:42 · answer #3 · answered by abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
It is not the place of the American military to execute racist, imperialistic American foreign policy. The deployment of troops has led Iraq down the road to civil war, which is at the cost of democracy. Do you know that the citizens of Iraq actually voted in Saddam Hussein? Why do we want to violate their democratic rights?
I am not suggesting the policies of his regime were good because Shiah Muslims were excluded from any element of decision-making in his government and yet they form the majority of citizens and the largest voting block. Selective discrimination, I guess. Also, the Kurds are simply entitled to more than internments at refugee camps without food, education, housing, health care and other basic rights.
The Democrats, if in power, might have voted for the same thing. We can glorify Bill Clinton because he is not in power. Now he is an amazing man in his own way, but he is not in power. Better to discuss his contributions to the fight against HIV/AIDS, civil rights, innovation in environmental and economic policy and his anti-poverty programs that provide education and training and support for the creation of one's own business.
2006-10-20 05:13:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
They'll stay and set up a terrorist dictatorship .
All that oil money will go to buying Nukes to blow us to hell .
N.Korea has some for sale .
2006-10-20 05:20:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
When your next message comes from the war zone, THEN we'll take your swaggering macho bravado seriously, Mr. Bring 'Em On!
2006-10-20 05:13:18 · answer #6 · answered by backinbowl 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
The second part is correct
2006-10-20 05:10:07 · answer #7 · answered by John Scary 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
That's their problem.
2006-10-20 05:51:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋