English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Considering that worldwide levels continue to rachet up, and Americans, like any other members of a Democracy want to feel safe before anything else (see the Maslow hierarchy), doesnt it seem most likely they will vote in a war hawk that promises tuffer measures against Islamists?

Personally, I wont vote for anyone who doesnt promise on his mothers grave to end dependance of Islamic oil.

2006-10-19 15:41:40 · 12 answers · asked by WWND 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

12 answers

i hope the next president uses a "scorched earth" policy. turn the vast deserts of saudi arabia into a fused glass parking lot.

nuke the terrorists till they glow and then shoot them in the dark.

2006-10-19 15:44:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Maybe, just maybe, we will be lucky enough to elect a guy who will treat the Islamic people as the American Revolutionist would have liked to have been treated - you know, as grown up, rational people who have a legitimate way of life and a right to self govern themselves.

I think it would be very wise for us to end dependance on Islamic Oil - and frankly it would have to be a very strong President and Congress and Senate that would ignore big oil's money and campaign donations and go with some of the really viable options that are available today.

Peace!

2006-10-19 15:48:44 · answer #2 · answered by carole 7 · 0 0

I think the next president will suffer a great deal trying to balance freedom with fanaticism.
To internect an iota of humor, if the next president's mother isn't dead, you may not get to vote.

2006-10-19 15:45:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

God help us if it is a liberal. I wouldn't mind a conservative democrat like Leiberman. Liberals would have us convert to Islam to appease the terrorists. Then, they would offer a piece of America for peace.

2006-10-19 15:48:51 · answer #4 · answered by Search4truth 4 · 0 0

Bring Clinton back, more sex in the Oval Office and less problems in the world, a better way of life!

2006-10-19 15:45:58 · answer #5 · answered by Michael 5 · 3 1

i asked a similar question. I conclude that the next president will be black, ergo we will face apocalypse. (see the bible). If Mabela becomes the next president. He will anger North Korea, who is allies with Iran, then they will nuke us and we will nuke them shortly after. Then the end of the world.

2006-10-19 15:45:48 · answer #6 · answered by losangelesmoons 2 · 0 1

Hopefully by realizing that we need to pull out of Middle-East all together and let them fight amongst themselves - and, if they attack our country let them know we will let our nukes do the talking!

2006-10-19 15:47:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Yeah, NO MORE BLOOD FOR OIL. Lets see if you guys stick with that.

2006-10-19 15:57:08 · answer #8 · answered by Muslim 4 · 1 1

Guess you wont be voting this year /

2006-10-19 15:45:45 · answer #9 · answered by Terry S 5 · 0 0

are you being hired to spread hate against muslims?

2006-10-19 15:43:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers