He would be a big believer in all things sugary. Reeses', M&m's, Bubble Gum, Fun Dip, Swedish Fish, those little red hearts, Snickers...
He would also believe in ME!
2006-10-19 14:29:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 1
·
3⤊
4⤋
Actually although Jesus was raised a Jew he started the Christian religion and those that follow in his teachings are called Christians however what was he before comming and after leaving see Isa 43:10-12 and Rev 1:5 sums it all up read theese scriptures for your answer also see Ps 83;18 for the name of his Father OKJV gorbalizer BTW Jesus is very much alive forever
2006-10-19 16:31:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by gorbalizer 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
If he were alive to today he would follow Yahweh and the Torah which is what all Israel was commanded to do. You can call it Judaism for lack of a better term (maybe Yahwism is better). However, it would not be the same form of Judaism that you see today. It would be a much simpler form of it without all of the oral laws that were added to the commandments by the rabbis over the past few thousand years. He would read the black and white text of the Torah and do what Yaheh asked of him as a Jewish man and not invent extra commands that were never intended.
2006-10-20 02:22:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by james.parker 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
"If Jesus were alive today, what religion would he be?"
If Buddha were alive today, what religion would he be?
If Muhammed were alive today, what religion would he be?
If Confucious were alive today, what religion would he be?
If Guru Nanak were alive today, what religion would he be?
If Bahaulah were alive today, what religion would he be?
Heck!! While we are at it, if L. Ron Hubbard(Scientology) or Gerald B. Gardner(Wicca)were alive today, what religions would they be?
2006-10-19 17:17:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by clusium1971 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jesus would not belong to any religion, He didn't come to earth to invent religion, in the book of Isaiah it says I come to set the captive free .
2006-10-19 16:40:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tinkerbelle 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Just like some 2000 years ago, he would not have a religion, but he would go to the synagogue and read the scripture and pray to God. Christianity would not be available yet, neither protestant nor catholic. If this were the case, would you be his follower or the follower of the religious leaders?
2006-10-19 14:42:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by The Mask 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
nearly everyones answers are disrespectful. I mean come on! Love reeses and m&ms!
Jesus was never a follower, more a leader. Its really a pointless question, but the most accurate religion to the Bible would be Christadelphian.
2006-10-19 14:39:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tyler D 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Jesus is alive today!
2006-10-19 14:31:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by pollywollydoda 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Since there is only one religion--the religion of God, which has been known by various names down through the ages, and is known in this day by the name "Bahai", that would be the name of His one religion in this day.
Progressive Revelation
A great stumbling block to many, in the way of religious unity, is the difference between the Revelations given by the different Prophets. What is commanded by one is forbidden by another; how then can both be right, how can both be proclaiming the Will of God? Surely the truth is One, and cannot change. Yes, the Absolute Truth is One and cannot change, but the Absolute Truth is infinitely beyond the present range of human understanding, and our conceptions of it must constantly change. Our earlier, imperfect ideas will be by the Grace of God replaced, as time goes on, by more and more adequate conceptions. Bahá’u’lláh says, in a Tablet to some Bahá’ís of Persia:—
O people! Words are revealed according to capacity so that the beginners may make progress. The milk must be given according to measure so that the babe of the world may enter into the Realm of Grandeur and be established in the Court of Unity.
It is milk that strengthens the babe so that it can digest more solid food later on. To say that because one Prophet is right in giving a certain teaching at a certain time, therefore another Prophet must be wrong Who gives a different teaching at a different time, is like saying that because milk is the best food 123 for the newborn babe, therefore, milk and nothing but milk should be the food of the grown man also, and to give any other diet would be wrong! ‘Abdu’l-Bahá says:—
Each divine revelation is divided into two parts. The first part is essential and belongs to the eternal world. It is the exposition of Divine truths and essential principles. It is the expression of the Love of God. This is one in all the religions, unchangeable and immutable. The second part is not eternal; it deals with practical life, transactions and business, and changes according to the evolution of man and the requirements of the time of each Prophet. For example. … During the Mosaic period the hand of a person was cut off in punishment of a small theft; there was a law of an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, but as these laws were not expedient in the time of Christ, they were abrogated. Likewise divorce had become so universal that there remained no fixed laws of marriage, therefore His Holiness Christ forbade divorce.
According to the exigencies of the time, His Holiness Moses revealed ten laws for capital punishment. It was impossible at that time to protect the community and to preserve social security without these severe measures, for the children of Israel lived in the wilderness of Tah, where there were no established courts of justice and no penitentiaries. But this code of conduct was not needed in the time of Christ. The history of the second part of religion is unimportant, because it relates to the customs of this life only; but the foundation of the religion of God is one, and His Holiness Bahá’u’lláh has renewed that foundation.
The religion of God is the One Religion, and all the Prophets have taught it, but it is a living and a growing thing, not lifeless and unchanging. In the teaching of Moses we see the Bud; in that of Christ the Flower; in that of Bahá’u’lláh the Fruit. The flower does not destroy the bud, nor does the fruit destroy the flower. It destroys not, but fulfills. The bud scales must fall in order that the flower may bloom, and the petals must fall that 124 the fruit may grow and ripen. Were the bud scales and the petals wrong or useless, then, that they had to be discarded? Nay, both in their time were right and necessary; without them there could have been no fruit. So it is with the various prophetic teachings; their externals change from age to age, but each revelation is the fulfillment of its predecessors; they are not separate or incongruous, but different stages in the life history of the One Religion, which has in turn been revealed as seed, as bud and as flower, and now enters on the stage of fruition.
2006-10-19 14:36:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by GypsyGr-ranny 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
Jesus is alive ! He sits at the right hand of the Father - soon He will come to judge the living and the dead.
This is gospel truth - blasphemers do not get to "vote" about it......
2006-10-19 14:47:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by oatie 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
of course He would be a Jew. That person that answered Christians do not want to hear that Jesus is a Jew. of course Christians know this, we read the bible too....
2006-10-19 14:48:52
·
answer #11
·
answered by K 5
·
1⤊
0⤋