can a police department be sued for realeaseing documents and info about evidence of a crime. that has?

Question

not had time to go to court yet, so they can be forced to be remained sealed for legeal purposes?

Answer 1

First anyone can be sued if they have the filing fee. If you can previal depends if you were damaged and the officer broke the law by doing this. If he did break the law and you were hurt in some manner which can be quantified then you can win and collect something.

Answer 2

First evidence is not "sealed" it is either allowed to be submitted into court or it will not be allowed to be used in court.

And unless a gag order has already been in place, the release of informaton on a case is allowed

For example, they can say a gun was found, or a person was shot, they can discuss drugs found at the scene,
Merely listen to the news every night and you will hear all sorts of evidence told about a crime that happened that day.

News people listen to police scanners, the get all the public documents, incuding the police report daily from police stations.

So to answer your question, no you can't sue them, if you believe there was some false evidence given out that would hurt your jury pool you can ask for a change in venue.

The Foley case is a good example, the news people have given out the wording of all of the emails and the instant messages which is the evidence if there was a case

Answer 3

that's a annoying tale to pay attention because of the fact i'm a canines proprietor. i'm additionally a cop nevertheless. regrettably it takes place very oftentimes that jointly as serving a seek warrant officials are attacked via the proprietors canines. i be attentive to on your case your canines wasn't attacking however the officer took the essential precautions. that's a foul element to examine. you should attempt going into the police station and chatting together with his superiors. in case you do settle directly to take this direction..do no longer pass in with an indignant and undesirable physique of concepts because of the indisputable fact that gets you nowhere. i'm undecided that there is something that the dept will do for you yet perchance you will a minimum of get an apology from his chief and the officer himself. In saying all that, i'm sorry for the shortcoming of your canines. that's a tragic tale. The officer did no longer act professionally in giggling at you afterwards. interior the warmth of the 2d nevertheless he observed the canines come working in the direction of him and oftentimes in those circumstances the canines is in attack mode. The officer might desire to have apologized to you afterwards nevertheless. i do no longer think of a regulation experience might surely pass everywhere subsequently so it would only be a waste of money to get the felony expert. lower back, being a canines proprietor and a cop I comprehend the two facets of the argument. the only element i did no longer like analyzing became which you may giggle the subsequent time an officer became killed interior the line of accountability. no longer anybody act like unprofessional officials and that's some thing that hits homestead while an officer is killed.

Answer 4

your legal representative can file a motion with the court ,like a gagging order but i would have thought that if the offences with which the person has been charged would have been compromised, in other word s would the person get a fair court hearing if the papers have published and evidence displayed,in the public arena, they should not have done so, LF

Answer 5

Unauthorized release of documents is illegal because the police authorities must properly secure and preserve evidence in their custody. The offense committed is infidelity in the custody of evidence which is punishable under the Penal Law.

Answer 6

I don't know if they can or not but I sure pray that we can come up with a better alternative of community safety then the police. it seems more and more common practice these days for the police to unlawfully convict innocent people of charges in which they are not guilty of.

Answer 7

You can sue them if you want but I can't say whether or not you would win the case. You first need to find out if the information they released was considered "public information" then decide from there.

Answer 8

If a woman can sue mcdonalds for dumping coffee on herself, you can sue for anything...whether or not you win is another story.

Answer 9

Its all public record

Answer 10

yes you can