Between Religious fanatics, Atheists, and George W. Bush who is the dangerous?

Question

Explain your answer and try to be as non-ignorant as possible.

Answer 1

Duh! Its Bush of course! He has all the good toys of destruction at his disposal and an army too back it up.

Answer 2

George W. Bush IS a religious fanatic, as are atheists.

The single-most dangerous religious fanatic is, of course, Bush. In body count, atheist Communists collectively (no pun intended) hold that record (150,000,000 in Russia, Eastern Europe, and China).

Answer 3

Religious fanatics and George W. Bush.
At least the Atheists think .

Answer 4

Religious fanatics are the most dangerous. George Bush just happens to be one of them.

Answer 5

Atheism is the disbelief in the existence of deities, and more specifically in the monotheistic Judeo-Christian God

What have the Atheists done to be lumped in with the religious Psychos?
Its the god botherers who cause 90% of the death and destruction on the planet.
I have a brain that doesn't need to be programmed by fanatics to live my life.
I don't need outdated dogmas and rituals to be kind to my fellow man
just good old common sense.
As for GW what a fu(king Idiot.

Answer 6

Atheism is a religion, fanatical atheists are as dangerous as other fanatics. GWB is considered a religious fanatic by some.

Looking at it this way, it is like asking which is tastier, apples or apples?

Defining fanaticism would be a good start. Here is my understanding of fanaticism:

The forcing of ones own ideas on other people and being willing to use coercion, dishonest means, illegal acts or terrorism in order to carry out your ideology.

Everyone has opinions and beliefs. We are free to express ourselves and to use lawful and peaceful means in order to persuade other people that what we believe is right (whether political or religious, social or whatever). A fanatic is one who will not stop within the bounds of decency, but will use nefarious methods to spread his own personal dogma. (Even certain atheists tend toward this.)

Answer 7

Of the 3 it has to be Bush.Closely followed by the religious fanatics who helped vote him into power.Only the atheists who voted for him could be considered dangerous.

Answer 8

I was going to say Bush but then i thought about it and realized that it's really the religious fanatics that support him that keep him in office... AND they do more damage themselves...

I'd have to go with the fanatics.

Answer 9

At this moment in time? Bush.

Societal pressure keeps the religion in check (even if they continue to complain about it). Atheists don't much care so long as their rights aren't violated.

Bush, on the other hand, is imcompetant, is at war with almost everyone around the world, is trying to take away peoples rights, and has run the United States into the deepest debt it's ever seen. He has the potential to start World War III.

Answer 10

Aetheists aren't dangerous, they are educated, informed and able to make decisions based on things that they can see, hear, touch, have some sort of proof of. There has never been a war created by two different factions yelling 'I don't believe in God', "NO - I don't believe in GOD!".
George W represents his country perfectly, and only reaffirms what the rest of the world thinks about America.

Answer 11

I'd have to say Bush--he's got the most control concentrated into a single person.

Have you heard about the new book Tempting Faith, from a former White House aide? Interesting look at a few of these ideas... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15269146/site/newsweek/