2006-10-19 12:01:18 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
No but I do think that you should be executed to put an end to your gene pool.
2006-10-19 12:14:49 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
No, I mean we leave it will be worse then it is probably. But do I agree with people that the way we are handling this should change yeah. I mean we are loosing so many good men, and women. But we have to stay there. But I don't even know how you could change the situation going on there. I mean we don't want the Shitites running the country. An the Sunnies don't want the Shitites running the country. An the Kurds just want to be independent. So I have no clue. Maybe they split the land somehow.
2006-10-19 19:57:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, he should be shot for sending them in in the first place. Given what damage they have done they have to stay to fix up the place.
OkieBoy one of the sure ways to lose a war is divide your own side, reject options and generally act as dumb as you. Your country is at war with an enemy that is trying to kill you. Neither you or the shrub have any chance of defeating them but you will continue to take up time and energy until you lose. With your last breath you will blame your political opponents while your real ememies cut your throat. I wonder who will fill the vacum you leave?
2006-10-20 13:54:20 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Slaughterhouse? Where? You spineless Kool Aid drinkers are all alike! You have absolutely ZERO concept of history and battle. We would all be speaking German or Japanese if you'd been around during World War II.
This war has the fewest (not most) casualties of any American war except one, and that is the first Gulf War.
Look at the stats in the link, if you have the 'nads to do it. and then leave it alone!
Word to OkieBoy: Kudos!
2006-10-19 19:25:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I am a soldier that just got back and I lost a brother in arms that was in my battle team. I take offense to people that do not have any respect for what soldiers are doing in Iraq. For one thing you should think about all the freedoms that you have in your life and thank the soldiers that fight in these wars for their sacrifices. Do you think that Bush is the only man that chooses if we go to war? NO, he isn't, he has advisers that guide him through each choice he makes. Advisers tell him what is going on in the world and what actions would be best to keep America safe. O and it is people like you( THE UNGRATEFUL FOR WHAT SO MANY HAVE DIED FOR TYPE) that I would like to stick on the front line and use as a human shield.............................
P.S. Have a nice day in our country that gives you so many freedoms, o and a great one one its self, freedom of speech.
2006-10-19 19:45:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
That isn't what he would go to trial for. The same old line about "We are there now so we must deal with it," just isn't going to cut it. The arrogant leadership should be held accountable for rushing to war without a plan and presenting misleading intelligence to congress.. They had plenty of warning that this could destabilize the region and that the intelligence was incorrect. This was no surprise to people with brains between their ears.
2006-10-19 19:16:00 · answer #6 · answered by Sketch 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Well...no, but he should be held accountable for bringing america into a war on the basis of false intelligence (can we all agree that this isnt a matter for debate anymore?)
Just looking at some of the answers, it seems like this has turned into a political mud fight, it just seems to me that the arguements keep getting oversimplified on the right - democrats are *******, hate america etc etc. but surely there must be a large number of republicans who dont beleive america should have declared war on iraq either?
2006-10-19 19:26:02 · answer #7 · answered by impeachrob 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
History will judge President Bush. Right now trying or impeaching him would be counter productive and waste valuable time and resources. Instead of blaming him for getting us into an illegal war by lying about WMD (which he did) and then mismanaging the war by not sending enough troops or supplying them, or not leaving as soon as we brought down Saddam, we need to focus on the present. We need an end strategy for this mess.
2006-10-19 19:10:43 · answer #8 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
i am sure that there are people out there that believe in your question...i support our troops in every which way since i am a veteran...i would love for them to come home and just make it all stop, but its not going to happen, not for a long time
2006-10-19 19:04:15 · answer #9 · answered by sherichance79 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Heres The Democratic plan folks!
Upcoming 2006 Democrat Convention agenda!
6:00 p.m. - Opening flag burning ceremony.
6:05 p.m. - Opening secular prayers by Rev. Jesse
Jackson and Rev. Al Sharpton
6:30 p.m. - Anti-war concert by Barbra Streisand.
6:40 p.m. - Ted Kennedy proposes a toast.
7:00 p.m. - Tribute theme to France.
7:10 p.m. - Collect offerings for al-Zawahri
defense fund.
7:25 p.m . - Tribute theme to Germany.
7:45 p.m. - Anti-war rally (Moderated by Michael
Moore)
8:25 p.m. - Ted Kennedy proposes a toast.
8:30 p.m. - Terrorist appeasement workshop.
9:00 p.m. - Gay marriage ceremony (both male and
female couples)
9:30.p.m. - * Intermission *
10:00.p.m. - Posting the Iraqi Colors by Sean Penn
and Tim Robbins
10:10 p.m. - Re-enactment of Kerry's fake medal toss.
10:20.p.m. - Cameo by Dean 'Yeeearrrrrrrg!'
10:30 p.m. - Abortion demonstration by N.A.R.A.L.
10:40 p.m. - Ted Kennedy proposes a toast.
10:50 p.m. - Pledge of allegiance to the UN.
11:00 p.m.. - Maximizing Welfare workshop.
11:30 p.m. - 'Free Saddam' pep rally.
11:59 p.m. - Ted Kennedy proposes a toast.
12:00 p.m. - Nomination of democratic candidate.
Any chance we could get Ted Kennedy to drive
Hillary home from the convention?
2006-10-19 19:05:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
Nope
2006-10-19 19:03:36 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋