I Believe If I was Prime Minister of the UK I would have the answer to the Immigration Problem?

Question

1) Like other Countrys like US, all Immigrants would be investigated before they left their country, to ensure they are finacncialy able to support themselves, and that they had a proffesion that was of value to the Country

2)All succesful Immigration applicants whould be monitored by an appointed agency for the first 2 years of their residency. And would have to visit their Local Police Station, to have their visa stamped, to confirm their whereabouts

3) Any Immigrant, weather, through selection or through Asylum seeker, would have to work and pay taxes into this country for 7 years before they would be eligable for any free housing, free health treatment or any other benifits, thus deterring people coming here for a free ride

4) There would be a zero tolerence on crime, any immigrant cough committin any crime would be deported back to their country immediately with no right to appeal

Armed Forces to Patrol All Ports & Airports

What Do You think

Answer 1

i would like you to be prime minister of this country , YOU have definately got it right , and if this or any other goverment dont wake up to how we feel ,there will be riots on our fast becoming third world country

Answer 2

I'll ignore your spelling mistakes.
1) Fair enough. Asylum seekers would have to be an exception to the profession and financially able to support themselves rule.
And asylum seekers would have to come to the UK while their application was processed, otherwise they would be arrested, tortured, or killed in the country they were trying to escape from.
2) Fair enough. But it would be expensive and bureaucratic.
3) It is not really the job of hospital staff to check immigration status or for paramedics to look for papers. Health care should be free to all. All children should go to school. Fair enough on the housing and other benefits, except asylum seekers would have to be given a job and housing.
4) There should be zero tolerance for crime anyway, but there should always be an appeal process. If the crime is a petty crime then, if they lose their appeal, the immigrant should be deported. For a serious crime, the immigrant should serve his or her sentence before being deported.
5) Armed forces in crowded areas are a really bad idea. Perhaps a few well placed snipers, but these cops with machine guns have to go.

Answer 3

I think those are all sensible and reasonable ideas- they seem pretty obvious measures to take, and your probably voicing the thoughts of a big majority. But, seriously, what are the chances of Britain implementing common sense laws like this? It's never going to happen. Immigrants see Britain as a push over. We can't even take care of our own, never mind hundreds of thousands from other countries.

If all illegal immigrants were found and removed from Britain, London would come to a standstill as there are so many working there. It tells you a lot about this country doesn't it?

Answer 4

I wouldn't let any more in until we had full employment and al the people who were already living here had the chance to earn a fair wage.

Then they can come and "do the jobs we don't want to do"!!!

Until then I believe the government should concentrate on the people who are already here and making sure they get a fair deal. At the moment they are not.

Also, I would not accept ANY asylum seekers. I'd send them to another country with a smaller population or more space, like Australia.

Answer 5

I agree with many of your points. People immigrating to another country should be willing to take care of themselves. Here in Canada, we are supposed to have sponsors for new immigrants (this is to help insure that they stay off welfare). The problem I see arising is what to do about refugees? Obviously they may not be able to meet your requirements....and I'm not to keen on your asking all immigrants to check in with local police station....sounds a little to much like a communist police state for my liking.

Good luck with the campaign tho'

Answer 6

probable because they are dumb. you ought to desire tho that human beings out of your united states take them up on the provision. India, from what I comprehend, is critically overpopulated. I advise, you've like 2 of the ten maximum populous cities and are style 2 in total inhabitants. no longer that India isn't an outstanding united states, i visit't say when you consider that I somewhat have not in any respect been there (altho i might want to opt to envision out Agra and Mumbai).

Answer 7

hey i would vote you in!
immigration is a big problem, i have nothing against them coming over here if they are willing to work and pay their way like the rest of us, but most seem to get a furnished house, money free healthcare etc, i do get annoyed at times as we the british seem to be 2nd, i have worked damn hard from the day i left school to be where i am today and i will continue to...but can i get to a dentist with my toothache? no chance (yes i am in pain so im allowed a moan)

Answer 8

i 'd like to go and work in the Uk some time after i finish my masters degree and i totally agree with all the conditions.
in fact i would prefer it if there were all those conditions.

til that time i ll come to visit the Uk from time to time just for a holiday and desperately play 'spot the white face' on the streets of london. such a pity :S

Answer 9

You should reopen Ellis Island dude. Except just use the boarder patrol.

Answer 10

If I were running your country I would make it illegal for illiterates to have access to the Internet. That way everyone posting on boards like this would have had at least a primary school education and we would be spared gibberish like this.